Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28835851›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of kidney health and disease2017

A Survey of Canadian Nephrologists Assessing Prognostication in End-Stage Renal Disease.

Brian Forzley, Helen H L Chiu, Ognjenka Djurdjev, Rachel C Carson, Gaylene Hargrove, Dan Martinusen, Mohamud Karim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of kidney health and disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. External validation of a prognostic model in routine practice for short- and long-term survival in peritoneal dialysis.Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Brian ForzleyDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Helen H L ChiuBC Provincial Renal Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Ognjenka DjurdjevBC Provincial Renal Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Rachel C CarsonDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Gaylene HargroveDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Dan MartinusenIsland Health Authority, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Mohamud KarimDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Island Health · CAFraser Health · CAInterior Health · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) frequently have a relatively poor prognosis with complex care needs that depend on prognosis. While many means of assessing prognosis are available, little is known about how Canadian nephrologists predict prognosis, whether they routinely share prognostic information with their patients, and how this information guides management.

objectiveTo guide improvements in the management of patients with ESRD, we aimed to better understand how Canadian nephrologists consider prognosis during routine care. DESIGN AND

methodsA web-based multiple choice survey was designed, and administered to adult nephrologists in Canada through the e-mail list of the Canadian Society of Nephrology. The survey asked the respondents about their routine practice of estimating survival and the perceived importance of prognostic practices and tools in patients with ESRD. Descriptive statistics were used in analyzing the responses.

resultsLess than half of the respondents indicated they always or often make an explicit attempt to estimate and/or discuss survival with ESRD patients not on dialysis, and 25% reported they do so always or often with patients on dialysis. Survival estimation is most frequently based on clinical gestalt. Respondents endorse a wide range of issues that may be influenced by prognosis, including advance care planning, transplant referral, choice of dialysis access, medication management, and consideration of conservative care. LIMITATIONS: This is a Canadian sample of self-reported behavior, which was not validated, and may be less generalizable to non-Canadian health care jurisdictions.

conclusionsIn conclusion, prognostication of patients with ESRD is an important issue for nephrologists and impacts management in fairly sophisticated ways. Information sharing on prognosis may be suboptimal.

Indexed as

chronic kidney diseaseconservative caredialysisend-stage renal diseaseprognostication

Identifiers

PMID28835851
PMCPMC5564856
OpenAlexW2745970185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.