Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28835712›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Association between taste receptor (TAS) genes and the perception of wine characteristics.

Maura Carrai, Daniele Campa, Pavel Vodicka, Riccardo Flamini, Irene Martelli, Jana Slyskova, Katerina Jiraskova, Alexandra Rejhova, Sona Vodenkova, Federico Canzian and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Tackling Atherosclerosis via Selected Nutrition.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Maura CarraiDepartment of Biology, Pisa University, Pisa, Italy.
Daniele CampaDepartment of Biology, Pisa University, Pisa, Italy.
Pavel VodickaDepartment of Molecular Biology of Cancer, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Science of Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
Riccardo FlaminiCREA - Research Centre for Viticulture, Conegliano, Italy.
Irene MartelliSistemi Territoriali S.r.l., 56021, Cascina Loc, San Prospero, Italy.
Jana SlyskovaDepartment of Molecular Biology of Cancer, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Science of Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
Katerina JiraskovaDepartment of Molecular Biology of Cancer, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Science of Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
Alexandra RejhovaDepartment of Molecular Biology of Cancer, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Science of Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
Sona VodenkovaDepartment of Molecular Biology of Cancer, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Science of Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
Federico CanzianGenomic Epidemiology Group, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Alberto BertelliDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Antonio Dalla VedovaCREA - Research Centre for Viticulture, Conegliano, Italy.
Luigi BavarescoDepartment of Sustainable Crop Production, Pomology and Viticulture Section, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, Italy.
Ludmila VodickovaDepartment of Molecular Biology of Cancer, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Science of Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
Roberto BaraleDepartment of Biology, Pisa University, Pisa, Italy. roberto.barale@unipi.it.
Charles University · CZUniversity of Pisa · ITCereal Research Centre · ITCzech Academy of Sciences · CZCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Experimental Medicine · CZHeidelberg University · DEUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several studies have suggested a possible relationship between polymorphic variants of the taste receptors genes and the acceptance, liking and intake of food and beverages. In the last decade investigators have attempted to link the individual ability to taste 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) and the sensations, such as astringency and bitterness, elicited by wine or its components, but with contradictory results. We have used the genotype instead of the phenotype (responsiveness to PROP or other tastants), to test the possible relation between genetic variability and the perception of wine characteristic in 528 subjects from Italy and the Czech Republic. We observed several interesting associations, among which the association between several TAS2R38 gene single nucleotide polymorphisms (P = 0.002) and the TAS2R16-rs6466849 polymorphism with wine sourness P = 0.0003). These associations were consistent in both populations, even though the country of origin was an important factor in the two models, thus indicating therefore that genetics alongside cultural factors also play a significant role in the individual liking of wine.

Indexed as

Genetic Association StudiesWineAdultAllelesCzech RepublicFemaleGene FrequencyGenotypeHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotidePropylthiouracilTasteTaste BudsPropylthiouracil

Identifiers

PMID28835712
PMCPMC5569080
OpenAlexW2745763824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.