Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28835692›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

The vaginal microbiome of pregnant women is less rich and diverse, with lower prevalence of Mollicutes, compared to non-pregnant women.

Aline C Freitas, Bonnie Chaban, Alan Bocking, Maria Rocco, Siwen Yang, Janet E Hill, Deborah M Money, VOGUE Research Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 108 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
108citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

108 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. VaginalFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Vaginal Microbiome and the Risk of Preterm Birth in Women Living With HIV: A Scoping Review.American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2024
    Article

48 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aline C FreitasDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5B4, Canada.
Bonnie ChabanDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5B4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3787-0993
Alan BockingDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Physiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5G 1L4, Canada.
Maria RoccoLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, M5T1×5, Canada.
Siwen YangDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Physiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5G 1L4, Canada.
Janet E HillDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5B4, Canada.
Deborah M MoneyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada. deborah.money@ubc.ca.
VOGUE Research Group

Funding

CIHR MOP-82799
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The vaginal microbiome plays an important role in maternal and neonatal health. Imbalances in this microbiota (dysbiosis) during pregnancy are associated with negative reproductive outcomes, such as pregnancy loss and preterm birth, but the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. Consequently a comprehensive understanding of the baseline microbiome in healthy pregnancy is needed. We characterized the vaginal microbiomes of healthy pregnant women at 11-16 weeks of gestational age (n = 182) and compared them to those of non-pregnant women (n = 310). Profiles were created by pyrosequencing of the cpn60 universal target region. Microbiome profiles of pregnant women clustered into six Community State Types: I, II, III, IVC, IVD and V. Overall microbiome profiles could not be distinguished based on pregnancy status. However, the vaginal microbiomes of women with healthy ongoing pregnancies had lower richness and diversity, lower prevalence of Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma and higher bacterial load when compared to non-pregnant women. Lactobacillus abundance was also greater in the microbiomes of pregnant women with Lactobacillus-dominated CSTs in comparison with non-pregnant women. This study provides further information regarding characteristics of the vaginal microbiome of low-risk pregnant women, providing a baseline for forthcoming studies investigating the diagnostic potential of the microbiome for prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Indexed as

BiodiversityMicrobiotaAdolescentAdultBacterial LoadFemaleHumansLactobacillusMetagenomeMetagenomicsMiddle AgedPhylogenyPregnancyRNA, Ribosomal, 16STenericutesVaginaRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID28835692
PMCPMC5569030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.