Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28835649›Full record

ArticleNature communications2017

Extracellular-matrix-mediated osmotic pressure drives Vibrio cholerae biofilm expansion and cheater exclusion.

Jing Yan, Carey D Nadell, Howard A Stone, Ned S Wingreen, Bonnie L Bassler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 194 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mesolens imaging in microbiology.Essays in biochemistry · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. What is active wetting?The European physical journal. E, Soft matter · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Dissecting the physics of bacterial biofilms with agent-based simulations.Current opinion in solid state & materials science · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Stress adaptation underMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jing YanDepartment of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA.
Carey D NadellDepartment of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA.
Howard A StoneDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9670-0639
Ned S WingreenDepartment of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA. wingreen@princeton.edu.
Bonnie L BasslerDepartment of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA. bbassler@princeton.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0043-746X
Princeton University · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

Intra-and Inter-Species Communication in BacteriaR01GM065859 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI BASSLER, BONNIE L · 2002 to 2015
$4.2M
Intra- and Inter- Species Communication in BacteriaR37GM065859 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI BASSLER, BONNIE L · 2016 to 2025
$3.4M
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofilms, surface-attached communities of bacteria encased in an extracellular matrix, are a major mode of bacterial life. How the material properties of the matrix contribute to biofilm growth and robustness is largely unexplored, in particular in response to environmental perturbations such as changes in osmotic pressure. Here, using Vibrio cholerae as our model organism, we show that during active cell growth, matrix production enables biofilm-dwelling bacterial cells to establish an osmotic pressure difference between the biofilm and the external environment. This pressure difference promotes biofilm expansion on nutritious surfaces by physically swelling the colony, which enhances nutrient uptake, and enables matrix-producing cells to outcompete non-matrix-producing cheaters via physical exclusion. Osmotic pressure together with crosslinking of the matrix also controls the growth of submerged biofilms and their susceptibility to invasion by planktonic cells. As the basic physicochemical principles of matrix crosslinking and osmotic swelling are universal, our findings may have implications for other biofilm-forming bacterial species.Most bacteria live in biofilms, surface-attached communities encased in an extracellular matrix. Here, Yan et al. show that matrix production in Vibrio cholerae increases the osmotic pressure within the biofilm, promoting biofilm expansion and physical exclusion of non-matrix producing cheaters.

Indexed as

Osmotic PressureBacterial ProteinsBiofilmsExtracellular MatrixMicroscopy, ConfocalMutationVibrio choleraeBacterial Proteins

Identifiers

PMID28835649
PMCPMC5569112
OpenAlexW2750504617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.