Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28835557›Full record

ReviewProceedings. Biological sciences2017

A hypothesis on a role of oxytocin in the social mechanisms of speech and vocal learning.

Constantina Theofanopoulou, Cedric Boeckx, Erich D Jarvis

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. A journey from speech to dance through the field of oxytocin.Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Oxytocin and love: Myths, metaphors and mysteries.Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. The emergence of emotionally modern humans: implications for language and learning.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Constantina TheofanopoulouSection of General Linguistics, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2014-7563
Cedric BoeckxSection of General Linguistics, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8882-9718
Erich D JarvisDepartment of Neurogenetics of Language, Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA ejarvis@rockefeller.edu.
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · USInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats · ESUniversitat de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Language acquisition in humans and song learning in songbirds naturally happen as a social learning experience, providing an excellent opportunity to reveal social motivation and reward mechanisms that boost sensorimotor learning. Our knowledge about the molecules and circuits that control these social mechanisms for vocal learning and language is limited. Here we propose a hypothesis of a role for oxytocin (OT) in the social motivation and evolution of vocal learning and language. Building upon existing evidence, we suggest specific neural pathways and mechanisms through which OT might modulate vocal learning circuits in specific developmental stages.

Indexed as

LearningSpeechAnimalsHumansLanguageOxytocinSongbirdsVocalization, AnimalOxytocinbirdsongdopaminelanguageoxytocinvocal learning

Identifiers

PMID28835557
PMCPMC5577482
OpenAlexW2747552061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.