Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28835434›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Cell physiology2017

Stretch activation properties of Drosophila and Lethocerus indirect flight muscle suggest similar calcium-dependent mechanisms.

Bernadette M Glasheen, Catherine C Eldred, Leah C Sullivan, Cuiping Zhao, Michael K Reedy, Robert J Edwards, Douglas M Swank

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Cell physiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. The self-oscillation paradox in the flight motor ofJournal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bernadette M GlasheenDepartment of Biological Sciences, Biomedical Engineering, & Center for Biotechnology and Interdisciplinary Studies, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute , Troy, New York.
Catherine C EldredDepartment of Biological Sciences, Biomedical Engineering, & Center for Biotechnology and Interdisciplinary Studies, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute , Troy, New York.
Leah C SullivanDepartment of Biological Sciences, Biomedical Engineering, & Center for Biotechnology and Interdisciplinary Studies, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute , Troy, New York.
Cuiping ZhaoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Biomedical Engineering, & Center for Biotechnology and Interdisciplinary Studies, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute , Troy, New York.
Michael K ReedyDepartment of Cell Biology, Duke University , Durham North Carolina.
Robert J EdwardsDepartment of Cell Biology, Duke University , Durham North Carolina.
Douglas M SwankDepartment of Biological Sciences, Biomedical Engineering, & Center for Biotechnology and Interdisciplinary Studies, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute , Troy, New York.
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute · USDuke University · US

Funding

Modulating stretch activation to restore muscle and heart functionR01AR064274 · NIAMS · RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE · PI SWANK, DOUGLAS M · 2014 to 2018
$1.2M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR064274
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Muscle stretch activation (SA) is critical for optimal cardiac and insect indirect flight muscle (IFM) power generation. The SA mechanism has been investigated for decades with many theories proposed, but none proven. One reason for the slow progress could be that multiple SA mechanisms may have evolved in multiple species or muscle types. Laboratories studying IFM SA in the same or different species have reported differing SA functional properties which would, if true, suggest divergent mechanisms. However, these conflicting results might be due to different experimental methodologies. Thus, we directly compared SA characteristics of IFMs from two SA model systems, Drosophila and Lethocerus, using two different fiber bathing solutions. Compared with Drosophila IFM, Lethocerus IFM isometric tension is 10- or 17-fold higher and SA tension was 5- or 10-fold higher, depending on the bathing solution. However, the rate of SA tension generation was 9-fold faster for Drosophila IFM. The inverse differences between rate and tension in the two species causes maximum power output to be similar, where Drosophila power is optimized in the bathing solution that favors faster muscle kinetics and Lethocerus in the solution that favors greater tension generation. We found that isometric tension and SA tension increased with calcium concentration for both species in both solutions, reaching a maximum plateau around pCa 5.0. Our results favor a similar mechanism for both species, perhaps involving a troponin complex that does not fully calcium activate the thin filament thus leaving room for further tension generation by SA.

Indexed as

AnimalsCalciumDrosophilaFlight, AnimalHeteropteraMuscle ContractionMusclesMuscle TonusSarcomeresCalciumcalciumDrosophilaindirect flight muscleinsectLethocerusstretch activation

Identifiers

PMID28835434
PMCPMC5814588
OpenAlexW2749909284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.