Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28835400›Full record

Trial reportNeurology2017

Stenting for symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis: The Vertebral Artery Ischaemia Stenting Trial.

Hugh S Markus, Susanna C Larsson, Wilhelm Kuker, Ursula G Schulz, Ian Ford, Peter M Rothwell, Andrew Clifton, VIST Investigators

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neurology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
12.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 153 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Management of symptomatic vertebrobasilar dissection: What is the current role for endovascular therapy and stents?Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026
    Article
  9. Hemodynamic outcomes of stenting for vertebrobasilar insufficiency in patients with a low flow state.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Stroke risk prediction in symptomatic anterior circulation ICAD: Analysis of regional QMRA flow from the MYRIAD study.Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Prognosis of Proximal and Distal Vertebrobasilar Artery Stent Placement.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Use of drug-eluting, balloon-expandable resolute onyx coronary stent as a novel treatment strategy for vertebral artery ostial stenosis: Case series.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2024
    Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hugh S MarkusFrom the Stroke Research Group (H.S.M., S.C.L.), Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (W.K., U.G.S., P.M.R.), John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford; Robertson Centre for Biostatistics (I.F.), University of Glasgow; and Department of Neuroradiology (A.C.), St. George's Hospital, London, UK. hsm32@medschl.cam.ac.uk.
Susanna C LarssonFrom the Stroke Research Group (H.S.M., S.C.L.), Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (W.K., U.G.S., P.M.R.), John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford; Robertson Centre for Biostatistics (I.F.), University of Glasgow; and Department of Neuroradiology (A.C.), St. George's Hospital, London, UK.
Wilhelm KukerFrom the Stroke Research Group (H.S.M., S.C.L.), Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (W.K., U.G.S., P.M.R.), John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford; Robertson Centre for Biostatistics (I.F.), University of Glasgow; and Department of Neuroradiology (A.C.), St. George's Hospital, London, UK.
Ursula G SchulzFrom the Stroke Research Group (H.S.M., S.C.L.), Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (W.K., U.G.S., P.M.R.), John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford; Robertson Centre for Biostatistics (I.F.), University of Glasgow; and Department of Neuroradiology (A.C.), St. George's Hospital, London, UK.
Ian FordFrom the Stroke Research Group (H.S.M., S.C.L.), Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (W.K., U.G.S., P.M.R.), John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford; Robertson Centre for Biostatistics (I.F.), University of Glasgow; and Department of Neuroradiology (A.C.), St. George's Hospital, London, UK.
Peter M RothwellFrom the Stroke Research Group (H.S.M., S.C.L.), Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (W.K., U.G.S., P.M.R.), John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford; Robertson Centre for Biostatistics (I.F.), University of Glasgow; and Department of Neuroradiology (A.C.), St. George's Hospital, London, UK.
Andrew Clifton
VIST Investigators
University of Cambridge · GBJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GB

Funding

Department of Health 11/129/16
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare in the Vertebral Artery Ischaemia Stenting Trial (VIST) the risks and benefits of vertebral angioplasty and stenting with best medical treatment (BMT) alone for symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis.

methodsVIST was a prospective, randomized, open-blinded endpoint clinical trial performed in 14 hospitals in the United Kingdom. Participants with symptomatic vertebral stenosis ≥50% were randomly assigned (1:1) to vertebral angioplasty/stenting plus BMT or to BMT alone with randomization stratified by site of stenosis (extracranial vs intracranial). Because of slow recruitment and cessation of funding, recruitment was stopped after 182 participants. Follow-up was a minimum of ≥1 year for each participant.

resultsThree patients did not contribute any follow-up data and were excluded, leaving 91 patients in the stent group and 88 in the medical group. Mean follow-up was 3.5 (interquartile range 2.1-4.7) years. Of 61 patients who were stented, stenosis was extracranial in 48 (78.7%) and intracranial in 13 (21.3%). No periprocedural complications occurred with extracranial stenting; 2 strokes occurred during intracranial stenting. The primary endpoint of fatal or nonfatal stroke occurred in 5 patients in the stent group vs 12 in the medical group (hazard ratio 0.40, 95% confidence interval 0.14-1.13,

conclusionsStenting in extracranial stenosis appears safe with low complication rates. Large phase 3 trials are required to determine whether stenting reduces stroke risk. ISRCTNCOM IDENTIFIER: ISRCTN95212240. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that for patients with symptomatic vertebral stenosis, angioplasty with stenting does not reduce the risk of stroke. However, the study lacked the precision to exclude a benefit from stenting.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareStentsAgedAged, 80 and overAngioplastyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHematologic AgentsHumansIschemic Attack, TransientMaleMiddle AgedPercutaneous Coronary InterventionSingle-Blind MethodStrokeVertebrobasilar InsufficiencyHematologic Agents

Identifiers

PMID28835400
PMCPMC5606920
OpenAlexW2747578895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.