Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28835326›Full record

ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2017

Juvenile Stroke.

Florian Schöberl, Peter Arthur Ringleb, Reza Wakili, Sven Poli, Frank Arne Wollenweber, Lars Kellert

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. [Secondary prophylaxis of ischemic stroke].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The Interventional Effect Cannot Be Interpreted.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2018
    Article
  12. PFO Closure and Stroke.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2018
    Article
  13. In Reply.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Florian SchöberlNeurological Clinic and Policlinic, Großhadern Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München; Neurological Clinic, Heidelberg University Hospital; Medical Clinic and Policlinic I, Großhadern Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München; German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), partner site Munich Heart Alliance, München; Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Westdeutsches Herz- und Gefäßzentrum Essen, Essen University Hospital; Clinic of Neurology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research (HIH), University Hospital Tübingen; Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD), Großhadern Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München.
Peter Arthur Ringleb
Reza Wakili
Sven Poli
Frank Arne Wollenweber
Lars Kellert

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSo-called juvenile stroke, i.e., stroke in a person aged 18 to 55, affects approximately 30 000 persons per year in Germany and is thus an important cause of mortality and permanent morbidity. The spectrum of causes of stroke is broader in this age group than in older patients and is also differently distributed.

methodsThis review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective search in PubMed and on current guideline recommendations.

resultsJuvenile strokes are often caused by cardiogenic emboli (ca. 25%) and by vascular dissection (ca. 20%). Approximately 10% are due to rare causes such as vasculitis or thrombophilia, 25-50% remain cryptogenic, and 20-30% meet the criteria for an embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS). A rational diagnostic algorithm should be applied that is based on the relative frequencies of the potential causes. The acute treatment of ischemic stroke is the same for patients of all ages: the patient must be transferred as soon as possible to a hospital where a vascular recanalization procedure can be performed. From age 40 onward, there is a steep rise in vascular risk factors and therefore also in the resulting macro- and microangiopathy, which lead, in turn, to stroke. Only 40% of patients with juvenile stroke are ever able to return to their original occupation, and approximately one-third remain permanently unable to work.

conclusionThe high rates of cryptogenic stroke and ESUS among patients with juvenile stroke indicate that uncertainties remain in the diagnosis and treatment of this entity. The identification of rare causes of juvenile stroke requires a major diagnostic effort. Which diagnostic tests are useful or necessary in which patients is a matter that is currently decided on an individual basis. This is true, above all, of the indication for long-term cardiac monitoring.

Indexed as

StrokeAdolescentAdultEmbolismHumansMiddle AgedRisk FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28835326
PMCPMC5624273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.