Trial reportBMC musculoskeletal disorders2017
Prospective comparison of the anterior and lateral approach in hemiarthroplasty for hip fractures: a study protocol.
Trial report in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Course of fear of falling after hip fracture: findings from a 12-month inception cohort.BMJ open · 2023Observational
- Comparison of Anterior and Lateral Approach in Hip Hemiarthroplasty for Femur Neck Fractures in the Elderly: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes.Malaysian orthopaedic journal · 2022Article
- High risks of failure observed for A1 trochanteric femoral fractures treated with a DHS compared to the PFNA in a prospective observational cohort study.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2022Observational
- Intrathecal Morphine Is Associated with Less Delirium Following Hip Fracture Surgery: A Register Study.Anesthesiology and pain medicine · 2020Article
- Optimized clinical practice for superaged patients with hip fracture: significance of damage control and enhanced recovery program.Burns & trauma · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Direct Anterior Approach (DAA) is an alternative approach to the currently most used Lateral Approach (LA) for hip replacement in femoral neck fracture patients. Compared to the LA, the DAA minimizes soft tissue damage. Sparing muscle tissue may facilitate early and improved postoperative mobility. It may also be associated with fewer complications, increased quality of life and lower 1-year mortality. The aim of this study is to compare postoperative complications, hip function and patient mobility after hemiarthroplasty via the anterior or lateral approach following a displaced femoral neck fracture.
methods138 elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures will be operated using either the direct anterior approach or the lateral approach for a hemiarthroplasty in a single centre, prospective, comparative cohort study. The choice of surgical approach will depend on the expertise of the trauma surgeon on call. The primary outcome of this study will be the functionality of the hip after surgery measured using the Harris Hip Score during routine outpatient check-ups. Secondary outcomes include surgical and non-surgical complication rates, admission time, postoperative pain, rehabilitation time, performance in activities of daily living, health-related quality of life measured, cognitive function and balance. DISCUSSION: Many approaches are known for hip replacement arthroplasty in trauma patients with little consensus on the preferred method. Identifying the best approach facilitating an adequate and fast recovery could optimize patient independence and quality of life and minimize rehabilitation costs, morbidity and mortality rates. The study design will reflect daily clinical practice and aims to present an accurate depiction of clinical outcomes.
trial registrationThis trial entered the Dutch Trial Registry with registration number (NTR)6238 on the 24th of April 2017. http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/index.asp . Protocol version 2.0 16-03-2017.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.