Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28835226›Full record

ArticleBMC ophthalmology2017

Intraocular lens power calculation using standard formulas and ray tracing after DMEK in patients with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy.

Maged Alnawaiseh, Lars Zumhagen, André Rosentreter, Nicole Eter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Using the posterior to anterior corneal curvature radii ratio to minimize the risk of a postoperative hyperopic shift after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maged AlnawaisehDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Münster Medical Center, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building D15, 48149, Muenster, Germany. maged.alnawaiseh@ukmuenster.de.
Lars ZumhagenDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Münster Medical Center, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building D15, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
André RosentreterDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Münster Medical Center, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building D15, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
Nicole EterDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Münster Medical Center, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building D15, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
University of Münster · DEUniversity of Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe study presented here aims to optimize the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations in patients after DMEK by evaluation of the impact of the altered anterior/posterior corneal curvature relationship.

methodsScheimpflug-based Oculus Pentacam imaging was performed after DMEK surgery for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy. The IOL power was calculated for all patients by ray tracing, aiming for postoperative emmetropia. We also performed the IOL calculation using four third-generation formulas (SRK-T, Hoffer-Q, Holladay-1 and Haigis). The residual refractions for the individual target IOL were compared and analyzed.

resultsThis retrospective study included 42 eyes of 33 patients (age 68.73 ± 10.11 years) after DMEK surgery. The differences between the expected residual refraction based on ray tracing and that predicted with the third-generation formulas were statistically significant (all formulas p < 0.001). The highest mean difference in the residual refraction between the target IOL measured by ray tracing and that calculated with third-generation formulas was found for the Haigis formula (0.90 ± 0.40 D), and the lowest mean difference for the SRK/T formula (0.73 ± 0.49 D).

conclusionsDMEK surgery induced a relevant change in the anterior to posterior corneal curvature relationship; this needs to be taken into account in the IOL power calculation to avoid hyperopic refractive surprises.

Indexed as

Lenses, IntraocularAgedCorneaEndothelium, CornealFemaleFuchs' Endothelial DystrophyHumansKeratoplasty, PenetratingLens Implantation, IntraocularMaleMiddle AgedOptical ImagingRefraction, OcularRetrospective StudiesDMEKIntraocular lens power calculationRay tracing

Identifiers

PMID28835226
PMCPMC5569506
OpenAlexW2749504929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.