Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28835213›Full record

Observational studyBMC pregnancy and childbirth2017

Evaluation of the mobile nurse training (MNT) intervention - a step towards improvement in intrapartum practices in Bihar, India.

Aritra Das, Dipty Nawal, Manoj Kumar Singh, Morchan Karthick, Parika Pahwa, Malay Bharat Shah, Tanmay Mahapatra, Kunal Ranjan, Indrajit Chaudhuri

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Mentoring the working nurse: a scoping review.Human resources for health · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Aritra DasCARE India Solutions for Sustainable Development. H No. 14, Patliputra Colony, Patna, Bihar, 800013, India.
Dipty NawalCARE India Solutions for Sustainable Development. H No. 14, Patliputra Colony, Patna, Bihar, 800013, India.
Manoj Kumar SinghCARE India Solutions for Sustainable Development. H No. 14, Patliputra Colony, Patna, Bihar, 800013, India.
Morchan KarthickCARE India Solutions for Sustainable Development. H No. 14, Patliputra Colony, Patna, Bihar, 800013, India.
Parika PahwaCARE India Solutions for Sustainable Development. H No. 14, Patliputra Colony, Patna, Bihar, 800013, India.
Malay Bharat ShahCARE India Solutions for Sustainable Development. H No. 14, Patliputra Colony, Patna, Bihar, 800013, India.
Tanmay MahapatraCARE India Solutions for Sustainable Development. H No. 14, Patliputra Colony, Patna, Bihar, 800013, India. drtanmaymahapatra@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7033-1441
Kunal RanjanCARE India Solutions for Sustainable Development. H No. 14, Patliputra Colony, Patna, Bihar, 800013, India.
Indrajit ChaudhuriCARE India Solutions for Sustainable Development. H No. 14, Patliputra Colony, Patna, Bihar, 800013, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence shows that improving the quality of intrapartum care is critical for maternal survival. However, a significant rise in the proportion of facility-based births over the last decade in India - attributable to a cash transfer program - has not resulted in a corresponding reduction in maternal mortality, thanks, in part, to low-skilled care at facilities. The current study evaluated a mobile knowledge-based intervention aimed at improving quality of care by mentoring in-service staff nurses at public obstetric facilities.

methodsAn independent evaluation team conducted baseline and post-intervention assessments at every facility using a mix of methods that included training assessments and Direct Observation of Deliveries. The assessment involved passive observation of pregnant women from the time of their admission at the facility and recording the obstetric events and delivery-related practices on a pre-formatted checklist-based tool. Maternal practices were classified into positive and negative ones and scored. Linear regression analysis was used to evaluate the association of MNT intervention with summary scores for positive, negative and overall practice scores. We evaluated retention of intervention effect by comparing the summary scores at baseline, immediately following intervention and 1 year after intervention.

resultsIn both unadjusted and adjusted analyses, the intervention was found to be significantly associated with improvement in positive practice score (Unadjusted: parameter estimate (β) = 16.90; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 15.20, 18.60. Adjusted: β = 13.14; 95% CI = 10.97, 15.32). The intervention was also significantly associated with changes in negative practice score, which was reverse coded to represent positive change (Unadjusted: β = 11.66; 95% CI = 10.06, 13.27. Adjusted: β = 2.99; 95% CI = 1.35, 4.63), and overall practice score (Unadjusted: β = 15.74; 95% CI = 14.39, 17.08; Adjusted: β = 10.89; 95% CI = 9.18, 12.60). One year after the intervention, negative practices continued to improve, albeit at a slower rate; positive labor practices and overall labor practice remained higher than the baseline but with some decline over time.

conclusionsFindings suggest that in low resource settings, interventions to strengthen quality of human resources and care through mentoring works to improve intrapartum maternal care.

Indexed as

Quality ImprovementAdultDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansIndiaLinear ModelsMobile Health UnitsObstetric NursingPerinatal CarePregnancyNursingObstetric careRural health

Identifiers

PMID28835213
PMCPMC5569501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.