Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28835203›Full record

ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2017

Epigenetic variation between urban and rural populations of Darwin's finches.

Sabrina M McNew, Daniel Beck, Ingrid Sadler-Riggleman, Sarah A Knutie, Jennifer A H Koop, Dale H Clayton, Michael K Skinner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Epigenetic induction may speed up or slow down speciation with gene flow.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sabrina M McNewDepartment of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112-0840, USA.
Daniel BeckCenter for Reproductive Biology, School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164-4236, USA.
Ingrid Sadler-RigglemanCenter for Reproductive Biology, School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164-4236, USA.
Sarah A KnutieDepartment of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112-0840, USA.
Jennifer A H KoopDepartment of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112-0840, USA.
Dale H ClaytonDepartment of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112-0840, USA.
Michael K SkinnerCenter for Reproductive Biology, School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164-4236, USA. skinner@wsu.edu.
University of Utah · USWashington State University · US

Funding

EPIGENETIC TRANSGENERATIONAL ENDOCRINE DISRUPTOR ACTIONSR01ES012974 · NIEHS · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SKINNER, MICHAEL K · 2005 to 2018
$4.6M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES012974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe molecular basis of evolutionary change is assumed to be genetic variation. However, growing evidence suggests that epigenetic mechanisms, such as DNA methylation, may also be involved in rapid adaptation to new environments. An important first step in evaluating this hypothesis is to test for the presence of epigenetic variation between natural populations living under different environmental conditions.

resultsIn the current study we explored variation between populations of Darwin's finches, which comprise one of the best-studied examples of adaptive radiation. We tested for morphological, genetic, and epigenetic differences between adjacent "urban" and "rural" populations of each of two species of ground finches, Geospiza fortis and G. fuliginosa, on Santa Cruz Island in the Galápagos. Using data collected from more than 1000 birds, we found significant morphological differences between populations of G. fortis, but not G. fuliginosa. We did not find large size copy number variation (CNV) genetic differences between populations of either species. However, other genetic variants were not investigated. In contrast, we did find dramatic epigenetic differences between the urban and rural populations of both species, based on DNA methylation analysis. We explored genomic features and gene associations of the differentially DNA methylated regions (DMR), as well as their possible functional significance.

conclusionsIn summary, our study documents local population epigenetic variation within each of two species of Darwin's finches.

Indexed as

CitiesEpigenesis, GeneticGenetic VariationAnimalsChromosomesCpG IslandsDNA Copy Number VariationsDNA MethylationEcuadorFinchesGeographyMaleSignal TransductionSpecies SpecificitySpermatozoaCopy number variationDNA methylationEpigeneticsGalápagos IslandsGeospiza

Identifiers

PMID28835203
PMCPMC5569522
OpenAlexW2745160734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.