Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28835022›Full record

ReviewMolecules and cells2017

Application of Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy to the Study of Brain Function in Humans and Animal Models.

Hak Yeong Kim, Kain Seo, Hong Jin Jeon, Unjoo Lee, Hyosang Lee

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules and cells, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Non-invasive estimation ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hak Yeong KimDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, DGIST, Daegu 42988, Korea.
Kain SeoDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, DGIST, Daegu 42988, Korea.
Hong Jin JeonDepartment of Psychiatry, Depression Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea.
Unjoo LeeDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Hallym University, Kangwon 24252, Korea.
Hyosang LeeDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, DGIST, Daegu 42988, Korea.
Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology · KRCenter for Anxiety and Depression · USHallym University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is a noninvasive optical imaging technique that indirectly assesses neuronal activity by measuring changes in oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin in tissues using near-infrared light. fNIRS has been used not only to investigate cortical activity in healthy human subjects and animals but also to reveal abnormalities in brain function in patients suffering from neurological and psychiatric disorders and in animals that exhibit disease conditions. Because of its safety, quietness, resistance to motion artifacts, and portability, fNIRS has become a tool to complement conventional imaging techniques in measuring hemodynamic responses while a subject performs diverse cognitive and behavioral tasks in test settings that are more ecologically relevant and involve social interaction. In this review, we introduce the basic principles of fNIRS and discuss the application of this technique in human and animal studies.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainHumansModels, AnimalOptogeneticsSpectroscopy, Near-Infraredbrain recordingfNIRSfunctional near-infrared spectroscopyfunctional neuroimagingneurovascular coupling

Identifiers

PMID28835022
PMCPMC5582298
OpenAlexW2761414672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.