Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28834887›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2017

C-reactive protein and risk of ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jing Li, Xuedan Jiao, Zhongfu Yuan, Haifeng Qiu, Ruixia Guo

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Association of Kidney Function and Inflammatory Biomarkers with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Risk.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jing LiDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province Reproductive Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sun Yet-Sen Memorial Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China.
Xuedan Jiao
Zhongfu Yuan
Haifeng Qiu
Ruixia Guo
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough several studies have suggested an association between elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) and ovarian cancer risk, others have yielded contradictory results. To address this issue, we conducted a meta-analysis.

methodsStudies were identified by searching PubMed and EMBASE up to July 2017 without language restrictions. Six case-control studies and 1 cohort study were included, including 1898 ovarian cancer cases. Pooled risk estimates were generated by using the fixed-effect model or the random-effect model based on the heterogeneity between studies.

resultsAs our data shown, the combined ORs were 1.04 (95%CI: 0.90-1.21) and 1.34 (95% CI: 1.06-1.70) for the risk in the second and third tertiles of CRP with those in the bottom tertile, respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that with respect to the top tertile of CRP level, the association was significant for studies obtaining CRP from serum (OR=1.99; 95% CI: 1.30-3.07), conducted in the USA (OR = 1.41; 95% CI: 1.15-1.72), using high-sensitivity immunotubidimetric assay (OR = 1.37; 95% CI: 1.14-1.64), using Hs-CRP (OR = 1.46; 95% CI: 1.21-1.75) and with follow-up period longer than 10 years (OR = 1.41; 95% CI: 1.18-1.70).

conclusionCollectively, our findings propose that serum CRP levels may serve as an indicator of ovarian cancer risk. Further studies are needed to definitively identify the role of CRP in the etiology of ovarian cancer.

Indexed as

C-Reactive ProteinFemaleHumansOvarian NeoplasmsRisk FactorsC-Reactive Protein

Identifiers

PMID28834887
PMCPMC5572009
OpenAlexW2748170370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.