Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28834412›Full record

SynthesisArthritis care & research2018

Risk of Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation in Patients With Inflammatory Arthritis Receiving Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Tzu-Chieh Lin, Kazuki Yoshida, Sara K Tedeschi, Mirhelen Mendes de Abreu, Nikroo Hashemi, Daniel H Solomon

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Arthritis care & research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Hepatitis B virus reactivation in rheumatoid arthritis.World journal of clinical cases · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Gaps in Ambulatory Patient Safety for Immunosuppressive Specialty Medications.Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tzu-Chieh LinBrigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-8333-7666
Kazuki YoshidaBrigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Sara K TedeschiBrigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Mirhelen Mendes de AbreuUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro and Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Nikroo HashemiBrigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Daniel H SolomonBrigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

VERITY: Value and Evidence in Rheumatology using bioInformaTics, and advanced analYticsP30AR072577 · NIAMS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Katherine Phoenix Liao · 2017 to 2026
$9.8M
Patient Centered Outcomes Research in RheumatologyK24AR055989 · NIAMS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SOLOMON, DANIEL HAL · 2008 to 2017
$1.5M
NIAMS NIH HHS K24 AR055989NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR072577
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation rates in patients with resolved or chronic HBV infection, receiving disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and with or without antiviral prophylaxis.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. Electronic searches were conducted in PubMed, Medline, and Embase using Ovid through December 31, 2015. A search strategy was developed for each database using the following inclusion criteria: for participants, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and resolved or chronic HBV infection; for intervention, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors or non-TNF biologic or nonbiologic DMARDs; and for outcome, HBV reactivation. Four reviewers independently extracted study data and assessed study quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. To determine the pooled HBV reactivation rate, the variances of the raw proportions were stabilized using a Freeman-Tukey-type arcsine square root transformation, using a random-effects model.

resultsTwenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria. The overall pooled rate of HBV reactivation was 1.6% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.8-2.6) in patients with resolved HBV. Similar rates were observed in resolved patients taking TNF inhibitors (1.4% [95% CI 0.5-2.6]), non-TNF biologics (6.1% [95% CI 0.0-16.6]), and nonbiologic DMARDs (1.7% [95% CI 0.2-4.2]). We also found that the reactivation rate was lower in patients with chronic HBV infection who received antiviral prophylaxis (9.0% [95% CI 4.1-15.5]) than in those who did not (14.6% [95% CI 4.3-29.0]).

conclusionWe found that the HBV reactivation rate in inflammatory arthritis patients receiving DMARDs was low in resolved patients and moderate in patients with chronic HBV infection. Further, lower rates were observed in patients with chronic HBV infection who were using antiviral prophylaxis.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsAntiviral AgentsArthritisHepatitis B, ChronicHumansAntirheumatic AgentsAntiviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID28834412
PMCPMC5823713
OpenAlexW2749132076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.