Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28834390›Full record

Trial reportArthritis care & research2018

Implementation of Treat-to-Target for Rheumatoid Arthritis in the US: Analysis of Baseline Data From a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Zhi Yu, Bing Lu, Jenifer Agosti, Asaf Bitton, Cassandra Corrigan, Liana Fraenkel, Leslie R Harrold, Elena Losina, Jeffrey N Katz, Daniel H Solomon

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Arthritis care & research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The First Nations experience of accessing rheumatology services in a metropolitan hospital: A qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zhi YuBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Bing LuBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jenifer AgostiJRA Consulting.
Asaf BittonBrigham and Women's Hospital and Ariadne Labs, Boston, Massachusetts.
Cassandra CorriganBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Liana FraenkelYale School of Medicine and VA Connecticut Healthcare System, New Haven.
Leslie R HarroldUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester.ORCID 0000-0002-0170-2747
Elena LosinaBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jeffrey N KatzBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Daniel H SolomonBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Trial of risk mangement for prevention of accelerated atherosclerosis in SLEP60AR047782 · NIAMS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI LOSINA, ELENA · 2001 to 2016
$18.8M
VERITY: Value and Evidence in Rheumatology using bioInformaTics, and advanced analYticsP30AR072577 · NIAMS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Katherine Phoenix Liao · 2017 to 2026
$9.8M
Patient Centered Outcomes Research in RheumatologyK24AR055989 · NIAMS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SOLOMON, DANIEL HAL · 2008 to 2017
$1.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIAMS NIH HHS K24 AR055989NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR072577NIAMS NIH HHS P60 AR047782
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveA treat-to-target (TTT) strategy is recommended in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, health care providers' adherence to TTT in clinical practice remains unclear. We examined adherence to TTT in RA at US rheumatology sites.

methodsWe used baseline information from the randomized controlled Treat-to-Target in RA: Collaboration to Improve Adoption and Adherence trial, which recruited 641 patients from 46 providers practicing at 11 US sites. We obtained data on the implementation of TTT, patient covariates, provider characteristics, and site variables. We examined the implementation of TTT using 4 cardinal features: recording a disease target, recording a disease activity measure, engaging in shared decision-making, and changing treatment if not at disease target. These features were assessed across sites and providers. We calculated a TTT implementation score as the percentage of features noted. We examined the association between patient, provider, and site covariates and TTT implementation score using proportional odds models.

resultsThe implementation of TTT at baseline was suboptimal: 64.3% of visits had none of the TTT components present, 33.1% had 1 component, 2.3% had 2 components, and 0.3% had all components. The implementation of TTT was significantly different across providers and sites (P < 0.0001 for all). In the multivariable model, we observed that more experience as a rheumatologist was associated with a higher implementation score (P = 0.01 for trend). Compared with fellows, providers with >20 years of experience in practice were more likely to have more TTT components recorded (odds ratio 7.68 [95% confidence interval 1.46-40.52]).

conclusionWe found that adherence to a TTT strategy in RA was suboptimal, and it differed across providers and sites.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overArthritis, RheumatoidFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansMaleMiddle AgedRheumatology

Identifiers

PMID28834390
PMCPMC5823714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.