Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28833975›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID2018

Genetic testing in intellectual disability psychiatry: Opinions and practices of UK child and intellectual disability psychiatrists.

Kate Wolfe, Kerstin Stueber, Andrew McQuillin, Fatima Jichi, Christine Patch, Frances Flinter, André Strydom, Nick Bass

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genetics of Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. The composition and capacity of the clinical genetics workforce in high-income countries: a scoping review.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kate WolfeDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0044-5379
Kerstin StueberDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Andrew McQuillinDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Fatima JichiBiostatistics Group, Joint Research Office, University College London, London, UK.
Christine PatchGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Frances FlinterGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
André StrydomDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Nick BassDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
University College London · GBGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBThe London College · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn increasing number of genetic causes of intellectual disabilities (ID) are identifiable by clinical genetic testing, offering the prospect of bespoke patient management. However, little is known about the practices of psychiatrists and their views on genetic testing.

methodWe undertook an online survey of 215 psychiatrists, who were contacted via the Royal College of Psychiatrist's Child and Adolescent and Intellectual Disability Psychiatry mailing lists.

resultsIn comparison with child and adolescent psychiatrists, intellectual disability psychiatrists ordered more genetic tests, referred more patients to genetic services, and were overall more confident in the genetic testing process. Respondents tended to agree that genetic diagnoses can help patient management; however, management changes were infrequently found in clinical practice.

conclusionsDifferences are apparent in the existing views and practices of child and adolescent and intellectual disability psychiatrists. Developing training and collaboration with colleagues working in genetic services could help to reduce discrepancies and improve clinical practice.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelGenetic TestingPractice Patterns, Physicians'AdolescentChildHealth Care SurveysHumansIntellectual DisabilityPsychiatryUnited Kingdomclinical managementcopy number variantdiagnosislearning disabilityservice provision

Identifiers

PMID28833975
PMCPMC5836913
OpenAlexW2745862173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.