Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28833567›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of oral sciences2017

Guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited.

Ibrahim Elgali, Omar Omar, Christer Dahlin, Peter Thomsen

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of oral sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 344 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
344citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03840681 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Assessment of Guided Bone Regeneration in Atrophic Anterior Maxilla Using Native Collagen vs Titanium Reinforced Polytetraflouroethelene Membranes Using an Organic Bovine Bone Mineral

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2019 to 2019Enrolled20ConditionsGuided Bone RegenerationArmsAugmentation
NCT06186232 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation Of Bone Regenerated After Guided Bone Regenration (GBR) Using Customized 3D Printed Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) Membrane in Horizontally Deficient Maxillary Aesthetic Zone

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled6ConditionsHorizontal Ridge DeficiencyArmsguided bone regeneration (GBR).
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

344 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Comparative Analysis of Gelatin/Polylactic Acid and Commercial PLA Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Applications of DNA Hydrogels in Osteoporotic Bone Defects.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Natural Polymers in Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR).Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

284 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ibrahim ElgaliDepartment of Biomaterials, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Omar OmarDepartment of Biomaterials, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Christer DahlinDepartment of Biomaterials, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Peter ThomsenDepartment of Biomaterials, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3910-6665

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is commonly used in combination with the installment of titanium implants. The application of a membrane to exclude non-osteogenic tissues from interfering with bone regeneration is a key principle of GBR. Membrane materials possess a number of properties which are amenable to modification. A large number of membranes have been introduced for experimental and clinical verification. This prompts the need for an update on membrane properties and the biological outcomes, as well as a critical assessment of the biological mechanisms governing bone regeneration in defects covered by membranes. The relevant literature for this narrative review was assessed after a MEDLINE/PubMed database search. Experimental data suggest that different modifications of the physicochemical and mechanical properties of membranes may promote bone regeneration. Nevertheless, the precise role of membrane porosities for the barrier function of GBR membranes still awaits elucidation. Novel experimental findings also suggest an active role of the membrane compartment per se in promoting the regenerative processes in the underlying defect during GBR, instead of being purely a passive barrier. The optimization of membrane materials by systematically addressing both the barrier and the bioactive properties is an important strategy in this field of research.

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsBone RegenerationGuided Tissue RegenerationHumansMembranes, ArtificialOsseointegrationTitaniumBiocompatible MaterialsDental ImplantsMembranes, ArtificialTitaniumbiocompatible materialsgrowth factorsguided bone regenerationmembraneosseointegration

Identifiers

PMID28833567
PMCPMC5601292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.