Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28832578›Full record

ArticleHeredity2017

A two-locus model of selection in autotetraploids: Chromosomal gametic disequilibrium and selection for an adaptive epistatic gene combination.

C K Griswold, M W Williamson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

C K GriswoldDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
M W WilliamsonDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we present a two-locus model of selection for an autotetraploid population. We also investigate a measure of disequilibrium that occurs between homologous chromosomes in the diploid gametes of autotetraploids, namely chromosomal gametic disequilibrium. We apply the model and measure of disequilibrium to compare how an adaptive epistatic gene combination is inherited and selected for in an autotetraploid versus diploid population. Autotetraploids are expected to have higher genomic mutation and recombination rates relative to diploids, due to a greater ploidy level. These two processes can work in opposition in terms of selection for adaptive epistatic gene combinations. While a higher genomic mutation rate can generate the alleles that confer an epistatic combination more quickly, a higher recombination rate is expected to break the combination down more quickly. We show that chromosomal gametic disequilibrium in autotetraploids can potentially compensate for less linkage disequilibrium in autotetraploids. We also explore how double reduction affects the inheritance of and selection for an epistatic gene combination. Over all, our analysis provides theoretical evidence that adaptive epistatic combinations can be selected for more efficiently in autotetraploids versus diploids. This may provide insight into empirical work that finds epistasis has a role in causing population differentiation between autotetraploid plant populations.

Indexed as

Epistasis, GeneticGerm CellsLinkage DisequilibriumModels, GeneticSelection, GeneticChromosomesDiploidyPlantsTetraploidy

Identifiers

PMID28832578
PMCPMC5637366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.