Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28832557›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2017

Effectiveness of an Intervention to Promote Self-Efficacy on Quality of Life of Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma of the Zhuang Tribe Minority in Guangxi, China: A Prospective Study.

Jiamei Lu, Xiaofen Zeng, Jinlian Liao, Yong Zhang, Li Yang, Yuming Li, Jun Lv

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jiamei LuRadiotherapy Division, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China (mainland).
Xiaofen ZengRadiotherapy Division, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China (mainland).
Jinlian LiaoRadiotherapy Division, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China (mainland).
Yong ZhangRadiotherapy Division, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China (mainland).
Li YangNursing Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China (mainland).
Yuming LiMental Health Division, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China (mainland).
Jun LvRadiotherapy Division, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China (mainland).
Guangxi Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is endemic in China and patient self-management is poor. Minorities may suffer from psychological problems during treatments for NPC. This study aimed to implement an intervention to promote self-efficacy of minority patients (Zhuang tribe, Guangxi, China) with NPC to improve their quality of life (QOL). MATERIAL AND METHODS This was a prospective study of 120 patients with NPC treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University (Guangxi, China), randomized to conventional care (n=60, controls) or conventional care plus self-efficacy interventions based on health education, behavior therapy, and psychological intervention (n=60, self-efficacy group). Self-efficacy was evaluated using the general self-efficacy scale, and QOL using the EORTC QLQ-C30. The questionnaires were completed at discharge, at 6 months, and at 1 and 2 years. The primary outcome was QOL. RESULTS There was no difference in QOL at baseline. From study start to hospital discharge, overall QOL scores decreased in both groups, but this decrease was more important in the control group (controls: -39.31 vs. self-efficacy: -27.04, P<0.05). After discharge, each functional field QOL scores and overall QOL increased with time in the 2 groups, and they were significantly higher in the self-efficacy group. CONCLUSIONS This intervention promoting self-efficacy could increase patients' own potential and initiative, enhance their confidence and ability to solve health problems, improve their coping with adverse effects of treatments, and have positive effects on their QOL. Self-efficacy theory-based interventions could be worth popularization during the treatment and recovery of minority patients with NPC.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalAdultAgedCarcinomaChinaEthnicityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMinority GroupsNasopharyngeal CarcinomaNasopharyngeal NeoplasmsProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSelf Efficacy

Identifiers

PMID28832557
PMCPMC5578692
OpenAlexW2747803800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.