Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28832539›Full record

ReviewViruses2017

Fighting Cancer with Mathematics and Viruses.

Daniel N Santiago, Johannes P W Heidbuechel, Wendy M Kandell, Rachel Walker, Julie Djeu, Christine E Engeland, Daniel Abate-Daga, Heiko Enderling

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Viruses, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Applications of Intravital Imaging in Cancer Immunotherapy.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Daniel N SantiagoDepartment of Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA. Daniel.Santiago@moffitt.org.
Johannes P W HeidbuechelGerman Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. j.heidbuechel@dkfz-heidelberg.de.
Wendy M KandellDepartment of Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA. Wendy.Kandell@moffitt.org.
Rachel WalkerDepartment of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA. Rachel.Walker@moffitt.org.
Julie DjeuDepartment of Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA. Julie.Djeu@moffitt.org.
Christine E EngelandGerman Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. Christine.Engeland@nct-heidelberg.de.
Daniel Abate-DagaDepartment of Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA. Daniel.AbateDaga@moffitt.org.
Heiko EnderlingDepartment of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA. Heiko.Enderling@moffitt.org.

Funding

Tumor Immunology Training Program -1 T32 CA115308-A1T32CA115308 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI WRIGHT, KENNETH LYNN · 2007 to 2017
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA115308
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After decades of research, oncolytic virotherapy has recently advanced to clinical application, and currently a multitude of novel agents and combination treatments are being evaluated for cancer therapy. Oncolytic agents preferentially replicate in tumor cells, inducing tumor cell lysis and complex antitumor effects, such as innate and adaptive immune responses and the destruction of tumor vasculature. With the availability of different vector platforms and the potential of both genetic engineering and combination regimens to enhance particular aspects of safety and efficacy, the identification of optimal treatments for patient subpopulations or even individual patients becomes a top priority. Mathematical modeling can provide support in this arena by making use of experimental and clinical data to generate hypotheses about the mechanisms underlying complex biology and, ultimately, predict optimal treatment protocols. Increasingly complex models can be applied to account for therapeutically relevant parameters such as components of the immune system. In this review, we describe current developments in oncolytic virotherapy and mathematical modeling to discuss the benefit of integrating different modeling approaches into biological and clinical experimentation. Conclusively, we propose a mutual combination of these research fields to increase the value of the preclinical development and the therapeutic efficacy of the resulting treatments.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalCell DeathCombined Modality TherapyHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansImmune SystemImmunotherapyLife Cycle StagesNeoplasmsOncolytic VirotherapyOncolytic VirusesVirusesVirus Replicationcancercombination therapyimmune systemimmunotherapymathematical modeloncolytic virotherapy

Identifiers

PMID28832539
PMCPMC5618005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.