Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28832265›Full record

ArticleJournal of women's health (2002)2017

Access to and Satisfaction with Prenatal Care Among Pregnant Women with Physical Disabilities: Findings from a National Survey.

Monika Mitra, Ilhom Akobirshoev, Nechama Sammet Moring, Linda Long-Bellil, Suzanne C Smeltzer, Lauren D Smith, Lisa I Iezzoni

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of women's health (2002), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Monika Mitra1 The Lurie Institute for Disability Policy, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University , Waltham, Massachusetts.
Ilhom Akobirshoev1 The Lurie Institute for Disability Policy, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University , Waltham, Massachusetts.
Nechama Sammet Moring1 The Lurie Institute for Disability Policy, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University , Waltham, Massachusetts.
Linda Long-Bellil2 Center for Health Policy and Research, University of Massachusetts Medical School , Shrewsbury, Massachusetts.
Suzanne C Smeltzer3 Center for Nursing Research, Villanova University College of Nursing , Villanova, Pennsylvania.
Lauren D Smith1 The Lurie Institute for Disability Policy, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University , Waltham, Massachusetts.
Lisa I Iezzoni4 Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, The Mongan Institute for Health Policy , Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Brandeis University · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USVillanova University · US

Funding

Health Needs and Barriers to Perinatal Care for Women with Mobility DisabilitiesR01HD074581 · NICHD · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI MITRA, MONIKA · 2013 to 2015
$1.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD074581
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious qualitative studies suggest that women with physical disabilities face disability-specific barriers and challenges related to prenatal care accessibility and quality. This study aims to examine the pregnancy and prenatal care experiences and needs of U.S. mothers with physical disabilities and their perceptions of their interactions with their maternity care clinicians. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted the first survey of maternity care access and experiences of women with physical disabilities from 37 states. The survey was disseminated in partnership with disability community agencies and via social media and targeted U.S. women with a range of physical disabilities who had given birth in the past 10 years. The survey included questions regarding prenatal care quality and childbirth and labor experiences.

resultsA total of 126 women with various physical disability types from 37 states completed the survey. Almost half of the respondents (53.2%) reported that their physical disability was a big factor in their selection of a maternity care provider and 40.3% of women reported that their prenatal care provider knew little or nothing about the impact of their physical disability on their pregnancy. Controlling for maternal demographic characteristics and use of mobility equipment, women who reported that their prenatal care provider lacked knowledge of disability and those who felt they were not given adequate information were more likely to report unmet needs for prenatal care.

conclusionsThe findings from this study suggest the need for training and education for clinicians regarding the prenatal care needs of women with physical disabilities.

Indexed as

Personal SatisfactionPersons with DisabilitiesAdultEthnicityFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansPregnancyPregnant PeoplePrenatal CareQualitative ResearchQuality of Health CareReproductive HealthSurveys and Questionnairesdisabilityprenatal carereproductive health

Identifiers

PMID28832265
PMCPMC5733660
OpenAlexW2749272309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.