Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28832069›Full record

ArticleApplied clinical informatics2017

Comment Topic Evolution on a Cancer Institution's Facebook Page.

Chunlei Tang, Li Zhou, Joseph Plasek, Ronen Rozenblum, David Bates

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Medical Information Extraction Model for User-generated Content.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chunlei TangChunlei Tang, PhD, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 1620 Tremont Street BS-3, Boston, MA 02120, USA, Phone: (857) 600-0628, Email: ctang5@partners.org.
Li Zhou
Joseph Plasek
Ronen Rozenblum
David Bates

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesOur goal was to identify and track the evolution of the topics discussed in free-text comments on a cancer institution's social media page.

methodsWe utilized the Latent Dirichlet Allocation model to extract ten topics from free-text comments on a cancer research institution's Facebook™ page between January 1, 2009, and June 30, 2014. We calculated Pearson correlation coefficients between the comment categories to demonstrate topic intensity evolution.

resultsA total of 4,335 comments were included in this study, from which ten topics were identified: greetings (17.3%), comments about the cancer institution (16.7%), blessings (10.9%), time (10.7%), treatment (9.3%), expressions of optimism (7.9%), tumor (7.5%), father figure (6.3%), and other family members & friends (8.2%), leaving 5.1% of comments unclassified. The comment distributions reveal an overall increasing trend during the study period. We discovered a strong positive correlation between greetings and other family members & friends (r=0.88; p<0.001), a positive correlation between blessings and the cancer institution (r=0.65; p<0.05), and a negative correlation between blessings and greetings (r=-0.70; p<0.05).

conclusionsA cancer institution's social media platform can provide emotional support to patients and family members. Topic analysis may help institutions better identify and support the needs (emotional, instrumental, and social) of their community and influence their social media strategy.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsData MiningHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansPatient AdvocacySocial MediaSocial SupportConsumer ParticipationData MiningHospitalOncology ServicePatient EngagementPatient SatisfactionSocial Media

Identifiers

PMID28832069
PMCPMC6220692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.