Corrigendum: Whole genome analysis of a schistosomiasis-transmitting freshwater snail.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Comparative immunological roles of TEP1 inFrontiers in immunology · 2025
   Review
2. Single-cell RNA-seq profiling of individual Biomphalaria glabrata immune cells with a focus on immunologically relevant transcripts.Immunogenetics · 2022
   Article
3. Identification and sequencing of the gene encoding DNA methyltransferase 3 (DNMT3) from sea cucumber, Apostichopus japonicus.Molecular biology reports · 2019
   Article
4. The genome of the golden apple snail Pomacea canaliculata provides insight into stress tolerance and invasive adaptation.GigaScience · 2018
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Erratum for
  Whole genome analysis of a schistosomiasis-transmitting freshwater snail.2017

Authors and funding

117 authors.

Funding

Abstract