Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28831736›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in neurology2017

Intravascular Lymphoma in the CNS: Options for Treatment.

Damir Nizamutdinov, Nitesh P Patel, Jason H Huang, Ekokobe Fonkem

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in neurology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Intravascular lymphoma with hypopituitarism: A case report.World journal of clinical oncology · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Damir NizamutdinovCollege of Medicine, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Temple, TX, USA.
Nitesh P PatelCollege of Medicine, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Temple, TX, USA.
Jason H HuangCollege of Medicine, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Temple, TX, USA.
Ekokobe FonkemCollege of Medicine, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Temple, TX, USA. Ekokobe.Fonkem@BSWHealth.org.
Baylor Scott & White Health · USTexas A&M Health Science Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose of review The purpose of this review was to discuss therapeutic manipulations and effective current interventions available to treat intravascular lymphoma in the central nervous system. Recent findings Patients experienced resolution and remission of disease for 14 months and up to 2 years after eight cycles of R-CHOP and four courses of intrathecal therapy with MTX, cytarabine, and prednisolone. Intravascular use of unfractionated heparin during therapy may contribute to better outcome. Summary Series of therapeutic avenues were analyzed and compared. The effective current treatment of intravascular lymphoma in the CNS is considered to be a combinational intrathecal methotrexate-based chemotherapy with rituximab. Since intrathecal administration bypasses the blood-brain barrier, lower doses can be given, which thereby minimizes systemic toxicity. Practical use of intrathecal chemotherapy is also justified for prophylaxis in intravascular lymphoma-diagnosed patients without CNS involvement.

Indexed as

CNSIntravascular lymphomaTreatment

Identifiers

PMID28831736
PMCPMC5569665
OpenAlexW2749764332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.