ArticleEcoHealth2017
A Delphi Survey and Analysis of Expert Perspectives on One Health in Australia.
Article in EcoHealth, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Selecting Indicators to Monitor and Assess Environmental Health in a Portuguese Urban Setting: A Participatory Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Pooled it
- Economic methods and spatial scales in One Health: Results from a scoping review.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Review
- Towards an Ethical Analysis of Research in One Health (EAROH).Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2025Article
- Evidence gaps and challenges in maintaining and increasing vaccine uptake: A Delphi survey with Australian stakeholders.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025Article
- One Health Priorities: Advancing Veterinary Public Health in Latin America and the Caribbean.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Approaches for disease prioritization and decision-making in animal health, 2000-2021: a structured scoping review.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Article
- One Health: An Effective and Ethical Approach to Leptospirosis Control in Australia.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2022Review
- An argument for pandemic risk management using a multidisciplinary One Health approach to governance: an Australian case study.Globalization and health · 2022Article
- Are Physical Therapeutics Important for Stroke Patients to Recover Their Cardiorespiratory Fitness?Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Review
- The Precautionary Principle in Zoonotic Disease Control.Public health ethics · 2021Article
- The promises and pitfalls of polysemic ideas: 'One Health' and antimicrobial resistance policy in Australia and the UK.Policy sciences · 2020Article
- What makes an effective One Health clinical practitioner? Opinions of Australian One Health experts.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2019Article
- Beliefs, Attitudes and Self-Efficacy of Australian Veterinary Students Regarding One Health and Zoonosis Management.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2019Article
- Establishing research priorities to improve the One Health efficacy of Australian general practitioners and veterinarians with regard to zoonoses: A modified Delphi survey.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2018Article
- Managing the risk of Hendra virus spillover in Australia using ecological approaches: A report on three community juries.PloS one · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
One Health (OH) is an interdisciplinary approach aiming to achieve optimal health for humans, animals and their environments. Case reports and systematic reviews of success are emerging; however, discussion of barriers and enablers of cross-sectoral collaboration are rare. A four-phase mixed-method Delphi survey of Australian human and animal health practitioners and policymakers (n = 52) explored areas of consensus and disagreement over: (1) the operational definition of OH; (2) potential for cross-sectoral collaboration; and (3) key priorities for shaping the development of an OH response to significantly elevated zoonotic disease risk. Participants agreed OH is essential for effective infectious disease prevention and control, and on key priorities for outbreak responses, but disagreed over definitions and the relative priority of animal health and welfare and economic considerations. Strong support emerged among Australian experts for an OH approach. There was also recognition of the need to ensure cross-sectoral differences are addressed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.