Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28831652›Full record

ArticleDysphagia2018

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the SWAL-QoL Questionnaire in Greek.

Voula C Georgopoulos, Myrto Perdikogianni, Myrto Mouskenteri, Loukia Psychogiou, Maria Oikonomou, Georgia A Malandraki

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Dysphagia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Translation and Validation of Kannada Version of the Swallowing Quality of Life Questionnaire (KSWAL-QOL).Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Reliability and validity of the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (Greek adaptation) in neurogenic and head and neck cancer-related oropharyngeal dysphagia.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Voula C GeorgopoulosDepartment of Speech & Language Therapy, INTERACT Lab, TEI of Western Greece, Patras, Greece.
Myrto PerdikogianniDepartment of Speech & Language Therapy, INTERACT Lab, TEI of Western Greece, Patras, Greece.
Myrto MouskenteriDepartment of Speech & Language Therapy, INTERACT Lab, TEI of Western Greece, Patras, Greece.
Loukia PsychogiouDepartment of Speech & Language Therapy, INTERACT Lab, TEI of Western Greece, Patras, Greece.
Maria OikonomouDepartment of Speech & Language Therapy, INTERACT Lab, TEI of Western Greece, Patras, Greece.
Georgia A MalandrakiDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, 715 Clinic Drive/Lyles-Porter Hall Rm.3152, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA. malandraki@purdue.edu.
Region of Western Greece · GRPurdue University West Lafayette · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to translate and adapt the 44-item SWAL-QoL into Greek and examine its internal consistency, test-retest reliability, external construct validity, and discriminant validity in order to provide a validated dysphagia-specific QoL instrument in the Greek language. The instrument was translated into Greek using the back translation to ensure linguistic validity and was culturally adapted resulting in the SWAL-QoL-GR. Two groups of participants were included: a patient group of 86 adults (48 males; age range: 18-87 years) diagnosed with oropharyngeal dysphagia, and an age-matched healthy control group (39 adults; 19 males; age range: 18-84 years). The Greek 30-item version of the WHOQOL-BREF was used for assessment of construct validity. Overall, the questionnaire achieved good to excellent psychometric values. Internal consistency of all 10 subscales and the physical symptoms scale of the SWAL-QoL-GR assessed by Cronbach's α was good to excellent (0.811 < α < 0.940). Test-retest validity was found to be good to excellent as well. In addition, moderate to strong correlations were found between seven of the ten subscales of the SWAL-QoL-GR with limited items of the WHOQΟL-BREF (0.401 < ρ < 0.65), supporting good construct validity of the SWAL-QoL-GR. The SWAL-QoL-GR also correctly differentiated between patients with dysphagia and age-matched healthy controls (p < 0.001) on all 11 scales, further indicating excellent discriminant validity. Finally, no significant differences were found between the two sexes. This cultural adaptation and validation allows the use of this tool in Greece, further enhancing our clinical and scientific efforts to increase the evidence-based practice resources for dysphagia rehabilitation in Greece.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonQuality of LifeAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDeglutitionDeglutition DisordersFemaleGreeceHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesDeglutitionDeglutition disordersQuality of lifeSWAL-QoLWHOQOL-BREF

Identifiers

PMID28831652
OpenAlexW2746389092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.