Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28831639›Full record

ArticleEcoHealth2017

Human Exposure to Wild Animals in the Sankuru Province of the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Anne W Rimoin, Vivian Helena Alfonso, Nicole A Hoff, Reena H Doshi, Prime Mulembakani, Nevile K Kisalu, Jean-Jacques Muyembe, Emile W Okitolonda, Linda L Wright

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in EcoHealth, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anne W RimoinDepartment of Epidemiology, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, 650 S Charles E Young Drive, Los Angeles, CA, USA. arimoin@ucla.edu.
Vivian Helena AlfonsoDepartment of Epidemiology, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, 650 S Charles E Young Drive, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Nicole A HoffDepartment of Epidemiology, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, 650 S Charles E Young Drive, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Reena H DoshiDepartment of Epidemiology, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, 650 S Charles E Young Drive, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Prime MulembakaniKinshasa School of Public Health, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Nevile K KisaluVaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Jean-Jacques MuyembeInstitut National de Recherche Biomedicale, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Emile W OkitolondaKinshasa School of Public Health, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Linda L WrightNational Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Funding

Emergence of Human Monkeypox in Central AfricaK01AI074810 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI RIMOIN, ANNE WALSH · 2008 to 2012
$609k
NIAID NIH HHS K01 AI074810
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the high level of biological diversity in the Congo Basin and human population dependence on bushmeat, the DRC represents an ideal location for expanding knowledge on wild animal exposures and thus the potential for transmission of zoonotic pathogens. However, limited information exists on patterns and extent of contact with wildlife in such communities. Using a cross-sectional study, 14 villages in the Sankuru Province of the DRC were surveyed between August and September 2007. Villagers ≥ 1 year of age and at home of the time of the survey were eligible and enrolled to describe and assess factors associated with animal exposures (both activity and type of animal). Among respondents, 91% reported exposure to rodents, 89% to duikers, 78% to non-human primates (NHPs), and 32% reported contact with bats in the month prior to the survey. The most frequently reported activities included eating (95%), cooking (70%), and butchering or skinning of animals (55%). The activities and animals to which subjects had contact varied by sex and age. Moreover, we observed a high correlation of the same activities across animal types. In this and other populations that rely on bushmeat, there is a high frequency of exposure to multiple animal species through various modalities. In the event of future zoonotic disease outbreaks, effective public health interventions and campaigns that mitigate the risk of animal contact during outbreaks need to be broad to include various modes of contact and should be directed to both men and women across all age groups. As available information is limited, further studies are necessary to better understand the complex relationships and exposures individuals have with animals.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsAnimals, WildChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDemocratic Republic of the CongoFemaleHumansInfantMaleMeatMiddle AgedButcheringEmerging infectionsHuntingSpilloverWild animal exposureZoonosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.