ArticleEcoHealth2017
Human Exposure to Wild Animals in the Sankuru Province of the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Article in EcoHealth, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Serological Survey in African Nonhuman Primate Species in Cameroon and the Democratic Republic of the Congo Reveals Low Overall Seroprevalence to Mpox Virus.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2026Article
- High potential for zoonotic pathogen emergence through wildlife exposure in East Cameroon.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Article
- Bat-human interactions and associated factors among communities in Bundibugyo District, Uganda: A cross-sectional study.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Learning from over ten years of implementing the One Health approach in the Democratic Republic of Congo: A qualitative study.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024Article
- A systematic mapping review of links between handling wild meat and zoonotic diseases.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023Article
- Higher convergence of human-great ape enteric eukaryotic viromes in central African forest than in a European zoo: a One Health analysis.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Animal Models Used in Monkeypox Research.Microorganisms · 2022Review
- Risk Factors for Ebola Exposure in Health Care Workers in Boende, Tshuapa Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2022Article
- Environmental Drivers of Monkeypox Transmission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.EcoHealth · 2022Article
- Human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 transmission dynamics in rural villages in the Democratic Republic of the Congo with high nonhuman primate exposure.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2021Article
- An Ethnographic Approach to Characterizing Potential Pathways of Zoonotic Disease Transmission from Wild Meat in Guyana.EcoHealth · 2020Article
- Review
- Monkeypox Rash Severity and Animal Exposures in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.EcoHealth · 2020Article
- Controlling emerging zoonoses at the animal-human interface.One health outlook · 2020Article
- Monkeypox re-emergence in Africa: a call to expand the concept and practice of One Health.Expert review of anti-infective therapy · 2019Review
- Using physical contact heterogeneity and frequency to characterize dynamics of human exposure to nonhuman primate bodily fluids in central Africa.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2018Article
- Serologic Evidence of Ebolavirus Infection in a Population With No History of Outbreaks in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Due to the high level of biological diversity in the Congo Basin and human population dependence on bushmeat, the DRC represents an ideal location for expanding knowledge on wild animal exposures and thus the potential for transmission of zoonotic pathogens. However, limited information exists on patterns and extent of contact with wildlife in such communities. Using a cross-sectional study, 14 villages in the Sankuru Province of the DRC were surveyed between August and September 2007. Villagers ≥ 1 year of age and at home of the time of the survey were eligible and enrolled to describe and assess factors associated with animal exposures (both activity and type of animal). Among respondents, 91% reported exposure to rodents, 89% to duikers, 78% to non-human primates (NHPs), and 32% reported contact with bats in the month prior to the survey. The most frequently reported activities included eating (95%), cooking (70%), and butchering or skinning of animals (55%). The activities and animals to which subjects had contact varied by sex and age. Moreover, we observed a high correlation of the same activities across animal types. In this and other populations that rely on bushmeat, there is a high frequency of exposure to multiple animal species through various modalities. In the event of future zoonotic disease outbreaks, effective public health interventions and campaigns that mitigate the risk of animal contact during outbreaks need to be broad to include various modes of contact and should be directed to both men and women across all age groups. As available information is limited, further studies are necessary to better understand the complex relationships and exposures individuals have with animals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28831639What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.