Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28831556›Full record

ReviewHerzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie2017

[Active cardiac implantable electronic devices: What is possible in ambulatory health care in 2017?]

Karin Rybak

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karin RybakPraxis für Kardiologie und Angiologie, Telemedizinisches Zentrum Dessau, Kochstedter Kreisstraße 11, 06847, Dessau-Roßlau, Deutschland. dr.rybak@t-online.de.
Städtisches Klinikum Dessau · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Telemonitoring (TM) features are implemented in nearly all cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) that have recently been released to the market. In combination with pacemakers, defibrillators and systems for cardiac resynchronization it is a safe and efficient method for routine technical aftercare of the devices as well as for monitoring heart failure and arrhythmias. Using TM has the potential to optimize patient care with regard to economic, clinical and safety aspects. Despite the good availability of existing data and clear recommendations of the responsible scientific societies, it is often seen as an isolated solution which is not fully integrated into standard care, although it has its own EBM number for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy systems. The reasons are not only the unsatisfactory reimbursement of costs, different IT structures and the borders between clinics and medical practices, but also acceptance problems of physicians and legal aspects. The compensation of cardiac pacemakers and 'event recorders' is unsolved. TM provides the prospect for optimal and cross-sectoral patient care. Furthermore it has the potential to become the standard method for the care for patients with a CIED.

Indexed as

AftercareAmbulatory CareArrhythmias, CardiacCardiac Resynchronization TherapyDefibrillators, ImplantableElectrocardiographyGermanyHumansPacemaker, ArtificialRemote Sensing TechnologyTelemetryArrhythmiasDevicesRemote follow-upTelemedicineTelemonitoring

Identifiers

PMID28831556
OpenAlexW2750189739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.