Trial reportJournal of neurology2017
Comparison of the efficacy of azathioprine and rituximab in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: a randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in Journal of neurology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03002038 (Comparison of Annual Relapse Rate, Expanded Disability Status Scale, and Side Effects Between Azathioprine and Rituximab in Patients With Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders), which is not on this map. Cited by 76 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of Annual Relapse Rate, Expanded Disability Status Scale, and Side Effects Between Azathioprine and Rituximab in Patients With Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders
Who cites it
76 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 186 citations in OpenAlex.
- Consensus Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders (NMOSD): The MENACTRIMS Guidelines.CNS drugs · 2026Guideline
- 2025 Brazilian guidelines for the management of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder in adults and children.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2025Guideline
- Efficacy and safety of monoclonal antibody therapy in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Pooled it
- A meta-analysis on efficacy and safety of rituximab for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders.Medicine · 2022Pooled it
- COVID-19 susceptibility and outcomes among patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD): A systematic review and meta-analysis.Multiple sclerosis and related disorders · 2022Pooled it
- A meta-analysis comparing first-line immunosuppressants in neuromyelitis optica.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2021Pooled it
- Different Targets of Monoclonal Antibodies in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders: A Meta-Analysis Evidenced From Randomized Controlled Trials.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Pooled it
- Effectiveness of rituximab in neuromyelitis optica: a meta-analysis.BMC neurology · 2019Pooled it
- Systematic Review of Safety and Efficacy of Rituximab in Treating Immune-Mediated Disorders.Frontiers in immunology · 2019Pooled it
- Disability Outcomes in the N-MOmentum Trial of Inebilizumab in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2021Trial
- Clinical phenotype and treatment response in AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD and MOGAD: insights from the Italian I-MS&RD registry.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Rituximab Versus Approved Therapies in Aquaporin-4-IgG-Positive Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.Neurology and therapy · 2026Review
- Patient-reported outcomes in Chinese patients with AQP4-IgG-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder on inebilizumab therapy: a cross-sectional study.BMC neurology · 2026Observational
- Clinicoradiologic profile of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder in a Kashmiri cohort: a prospective observational cohort study.Encephalitis (Seoul, Korea) · 2026Article
- Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder Disease-Modifying Treatments.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2026Article
- Inflammatory bowel disease therapies and demyelinating diseases: a practical guide to therapeutic benefit and risk.Journal of Crohn's & colitis · 2026Review
- Distinct remission immune architectures under rituximab and azathioprine in AQP4-IgG-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Ofatumumab treatment in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: a retrospective multicenter cohort study.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Immunotherapies in neuromyelitis optica: Bayesian network meta-analysis.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Rituximab as First-Line Compared to Escalation Immunotherapy Is Associated With Lower Disability Accumulation in Aquaporin-4-IgG-Positive Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder: A Multicenter Cohort Study From Germany and the United Kingdom.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) often follows a relapsing course. As disability in NMOSD is attack-related, effective treatments are needed. We aimed to compare the efficacy of azathioprine (AZA) and rituximab (RIT) as maintenance therapy in NMOSD patients. An open, randomized clinical trial was conducted during September 2015 to December 2016, in Isfahan, Iran. Initially, 100 NMOSD patients were approached, 86 entered the study, and 68 cases completed the trial. All patients had a relapsing-remitting course with expanded disability extended scale (EDSS) ≤7 (median 2.75, range = 0-7). Patients were randomized into two groups, which did not differ according to age, gender distribution, and disease duration. In the AZA group, 35 patients [20 aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-IgG positive] were started on 50 mg/day oral AZA and increased to 2-3 mg/kg/day (with oral prednisolone as adjunctive therapy). In the RIT group, 33 patients (13 aquaporin-4-IgG positive) received 1 g intravenous rituximab and repeated 2 weeks later and then every 6 months. Annualized relapse rate (ARR) was measured as the primary outcome and EDSS as the secondary outcome after 12 months of intervention. The mean ARR [standard deviation (SD)] in the AZA group decreased from 1 (0.38) to 0.51 (0.55) (P value <0.001) and in the RIT group decreased from 1.30 (0.68) to 0.21 (0.42) (P value <0.001). ARR after intervention minus ARR before intervention [mean (SD)] was 1.09 (0.72) in RIT group and 0.49 (0.59) in AZA group (P value <0.001). EDSS after intervention minus EDSS before intervention [mean (SD)] was 0.98 (1.14) in RIT group and 0.44 (0.54) in AZA group (P value <0.001). Nineteen patients (54.3%) in AZA group and 26 patients (78.8%) in RIT group became relapse-free after intervention (P value = 0.033). AZA and RIT can both effectively decrease ARR and EDSS in NMOSD patients. RIT was significantly more effective than AZA treatment. Trial Registration Name of registry: clinicaltrials.gov; ID: NCT03002038; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03002038 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.