ArticleDer Anaesthesist2017
[Migration of an axillary plexus catheter fragment : A severed catheter tip unnoticed on removal wandered into the central nervous system].
Article in Der Anaesthesist, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
migration of an axillary plexus catheter fragment into the intracerebral compartmentDuring removal of an axillary plexus catheter used for pain therapy, the catheter was probably inadvertently and unnoticed severed together with the suture fixation. The error went unnoticed and an approximately 14 cm long catheter fragment remained in the patient. The patient complained of neck pain, nausea and vomiting 2.5 years later. A computed tomography scan of the cranium and neck region revealed a tubular foreign body with a diameter of ca. 1 mm and a length of ca. 14 cm. The foreign body was identified to be the sheared catheter fragment. In the meantime, the fragment had obviously migrated from the axilla into the intracranial compartment. The tip of the catheter was found at the ventral surface of the pons and surgical extraction was not possible. Following a futile intervention by the hospital's liability insurance and despite evidence from an expert opinion for a gross treatment error, the patient took civil legal action against the hospital. A settlement was reached and the accused hospital committed itself to pay a compensation of 200,000 € plus any additional costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.