Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28831370›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2017

"Knowledge, recommendation, and beliefs of e-cigarettes among physicians involved in tobacco cessation: A qualitative study".

Binu Singh, Mary Hrywna, Olivia A Wackowski, Cristine D Delnevo, M Jane Lewis, Michael B Steinberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Electronic Nicotine Product Cessation and Cigarette Smoking: Analysis of Waves 3 and 4 From the PATH Study.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Article
  16. The Link Between Depressive Symptoms and Vaping Nicotine in U.S. Adolescents, 2017-2019.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Binu SinghDepartment of Health Education & Behavioral Science, Center for Tobacco Studies, Rutgers School of Public Health, 683 Hoes Lane West Piscataway, NJ 08854, United States.
Mary HrywnaDepartment of Health Education & Behavioral Science, Center for Tobacco Studies, Rutgers School of Public Health, 683 Hoes Lane West Piscataway, NJ 08854, United States.
Olivia A WackowskiDepartment of Health Education & Behavioral Science, Center for Tobacco Studies, Rutgers School of Public Health, 683 Hoes Lane West Piscataway, NJ 08854, United States.
Cristine D DelnevoDepartment of Health Education & Behavioral Science, Center for Tobacco Studies, Rutgers School of Public Health, 683 Hoes Lane West Piscataway, NJ 08854, United States.
M Jane LewisDepartment of Health Education & Behavioral Science, Center for Tobacco Studies, Rutgers School of Public Health, 683 Hoes Lane West Piscataway, NJ 08854, United States.
Michael B SteinbergDepartment of Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, 125 Paterson Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, United States.

Funding

Physicians' Perceptions, Attitudes, and Communication of E-Cigarettes (PACE)R01CA190444 · NCI · RBHS-SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI DELNEVO, CRISTINE D, STEINBERG, MICHAEL B. · 2015 to 2019
$3.1M
Developing and testing warning statements about e-cigarettesK01CA189301 · NCI · RBHS-SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI WACKOWSKI, OLIVIA · 2014 to 2016
$478k
NCI NIH HHS K01 CA189301NCI NIH HHS R01 CA190444
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physicians are rated the most trustworthy source of information for smokers and thus play an increasing role in disseminating information on e-cigarettes to patients. Therefore, it is important to understand what is currently being communicated about e-cigarettes between physicians and patients. This study explored the knowledge, beliefs, communication, and recommendation of e-cigarettes among physicians of various specialties. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in early 2016 with 35 physicians across five different specialties. Interviews were transcribed and coded for the following deductive themes: (1) tobacco cessation recommendation practices, (2) knowledge of e-cigarettes, (3) communication of e-cigarettes with patients, (4) recommendation of e-cigarettes, and (5) general beliefs about e-cigarettes. Physicians across all specialties reported having conversations with patients about e-cigarettes. Conversations were generally prompted by the patient inquiring about e-cigarettes as a cessation method. Overall, physicians felt there was a lack of information on the efficacy and long term health effects but despite lack of evidence, generally did not discourage patients from trying e-cigarettes as a cessation device. Although physicians did not currently recommend e-cigarettes over traditional cessation methods, they were open to recommending e-cigarettes in the future if adequate data became available suggesting effectiveness. Patients are inquiring about e-cigarettes with physicians across various specialties. Future research should continue to study physicians' perceptions/practices given their potential to impact patient behavior and the possibility that such perceptions may change over time in response to the evidence-base on e-cigarettes.

Indexed as

E-cigaretteHarm reductionPhysiciansQualitativeSmoking cessation

Identifiers

PMID28831370
PMCPMC5555092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.