ReviewOncoTargets and therapy2017
Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of circulating tumor cells in patients with head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis.
Review in OncoTargets and therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Liquid Biopsies in HNSCC: Current Landscape and Emerging Opportunities in the Era of HPV Stratification.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Liquid Biopsy's Role in Head and Neck Tumors: Changing Paradigms in the Era of Precision Medicine.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Review
- Application of liquid biopsy as multi-functional biomarkers in head and neck cancer.British journal of cancer · 2022Review
- Circulating tumor cells with FGFR2 expression might be useful to identify patients with existing FGFR2-overexpressing tumor.Cancer science · 2020Article
- Review
- Detection of circulating tumor cells in patients with laryngeal cancer using ScreenCell: Comparative pre- and post-operative analysis and association with prognosis.Oncology letters · 2020Article
- Prognostic impact of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1ESMO open · 2020Article
- Article
- HPV16 E6/E7 expression in circulating tumor cells in oropharyngeal squamous cell cancers: A pilot study.PloS one · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMany studies have assessed the clinical use of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in head and neck cancer, but the clinicopathological and prognostic significance of CTCs is still unclear. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwo authors systematically searched the studies independently with keywords in PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded and Cochrane Library (from inception to February 2017). The estimated hazard ratio (HR), risk ratio (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were set as effect measures. All analyses were performed by STATA 12.0.
resultsA total of 17 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Positive CTCs were significantly associated with poor overall survival (HR =2.80, 95% CI: 1.34-5.86), disease-free survival (HR =3.86, 95% CI: 2.03-7.36) and progression-free survival (HR =3.31, 95% CI: 1.71-6.42). CTC-positive patients tend to have higher recurrence (RR =2.13, 95% CI: 1.26-3.59) and regional lymph node metastasis (RR =1.18, 95% CI: 1.02-1.36) rate and a more advanced tumor stage (RR =1.16, 95% CI: 1.03-1.32).
conclusionOur meta-analysis has confirmed the significant prognostic value of CTCs in head and neck cancer patients. The presence of CTCs could be used as a monitoring tool for tumor status of head and neck cancer, especially for the early detection of the tumor recurrence and progression, advanced disease and the node metastasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.