ArticleScientific reports2017
Biodiversity conservation gaps in the Brazilian protected areas.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 42 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed.
- BrazilianToxins · 2026Article
- Underrepresentation of bats in Africa's protected areas.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026Article
- Phylum Rotifera in Peru: a review of studies on biodiversity and annotated checklist of taxa.ZooKeys · 2026Review
- Collaborative research networks as a strategy to synthesize knowledge of Amazonian biodiversity.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Mapping Resilient Landscapes to Climate Change in a Megadiverse Country.Global change biology · 2025Article
- Unsustainable land use trajectories in the Tocantins/Araguaia basin: Insights from future scenario modeling.Ambio · 2025Article
- Odonata Diversity and Ecological Thresholds in Protected Areas of the Brazilian Amazon.Neotropical entomology · 2025Article
- Spatiotemporal Analysis of Land Use and Cover Dynamics in Protected Areas of the Brazilian Cerrado.Scientifica · 2025Article
- Conservation challenges for Brazilian primates and the role of protected areas in a changing climate.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Phenotypic variation seems not to be associated with the genetic profile in Zygopetalum (Orchidaceae): a case study of a high-elevation rocky complex.Molecular biology reports · 2024Article
- The future of endemic and threatened birds of the Amazon in the face of global climate change.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Article
- Using biodiversity databases to assess vascular plant diversity in Protected Areas: a case study of Parque Estadual do Forno Grande, Brazil.Biodiversity data journal · 2024Article
- Protecting Life and Lung: Protected Areas affect fine particulate matter and respiratory hospitalizations in the Brazilian Amazon Biome.Environmental & resource economics · 2024Article
- Floristic survey of vascular plants of the Parque Estadual da Pedra Selada, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.Biodiversity data journal · 2024Article
- Assessing the role of protected areas in the land-use change dynamics of a biodiversity hotspot.Ambio · 2023Article
- Article
- Health Impact Assessment in protected areas: a proposal for urban contexts in Brazil.Cadernos de saude publica · 2023Article
- WHO Critical Priority Escherichia coli as One Health Challenge for a Post-Pandemic Scenario: Genomic Surveillance and Analysis of Current Trends in Brazil.Microbiology spectrum · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although Brazil is a megadiverse country and thus a conservation priority, no study has yet quantified conservation gaps in the Brazilian protected areas (PAs) using extensive empirical data. Here, we evaluate the degree of biodiversity protection and knowledge within all the Brazilian PAs through a gap analysis of vertebrate, arthropod and angiosperm occurrences and phylogenetic data. Our results show that the knowledge on biodiversity in most Brazilian PAs remain scant as 71% of PAs have less than 0.01 species records per km
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.