Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28831051›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

A mobile pathogenicity chromosome in Fusarium oxysporum for infection of multiple cucurbit species.

Peter van Dam, Like Fokkens, Yu Ayukawa, Michelle van der Gragt, Anneliek Ter Horst, Balázs Brankovics, Petra M Houterman, Tsutomu Arie, Martijn Rep

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 210 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Transcriptomic Differences Between TwoJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Towards a Phylogenomic Framework for theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  6. Involvement ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Solanaceous vegetables andHorticulture research · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The dual nature ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Peter van DamMolecular Plant Pathology, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7366-2860
Like FokkensMolecular Plant Pathology, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Yu AyukawaLaboratory of Plant Pathology, Graduate School of Agriculture, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology (TUAT), Fuchu, Tokyo, Japan.
Michelle van der GragtMolecular Plant Pathology, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anneliek Ter HorstMolecular Plant Pathology, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Balázs BrankovicsWesterdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0536-7787
Petra M HoutermanMolecular Plant Pathology, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tsutomu ArieLaboratory of Plant Pathology, Graduate School of Agriculture, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology (TUAT), Fuchu, Tokyo, Japan.
Martijn RepMolecular Plant Pathology, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.rep@uva.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-3608-6283
Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience · NLTokyo University of Agriculture and Technology · JPWesterdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genome of Fusarium oxysporum (Fo) consists of a set of eleven 'core' chromosomes, shared by most strains and responsible for housekeeping, and one or several accessory chromosomes. We sequenced a strain of Fo f.sp. radicis-cucumerinum (Forc) using PacBio SMRT sequencing. All but one of the core chromosomes were assembled into single contigs, and a chromosome that shows all the hallmarks of a pathogenicity chromosome comprised two contigs. A central part of this chromosome contains all identified candidate effector genes, including homologs of SIX6, SIX9, SIX11 and SIX 13. We show that SIX6 contributes to virulence of Forc. Through horizontal chromosome transfer (HCT) to a non-pathogenic strain, we also show that the accessory chromosome containing the SIX gene homologs is indeed a pathogenicity chromosome for cucurbit infection. Conversely, complete loss of virulence was observed in Forc016 strains that lost this chromosome. We conclude that also a non-wilt-inducing Fo pathogen relies on effector proteins for successful infection and that the Forc pathogenicity chromosome contains all the information necessary for causing root rot of cucurbits. Three out of nine HCT strains investigated have undergone large-scale chromosome alterations, reflecting the remarkable plasticity of Fo genomes.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, FungalDNA Transposable ElementsCell WallCucurbitaFusariumGenome, FungalGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingPlant DiseasesSequence Analysis, DNAVirulenceDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID28831051
PMCPMC5567276
OpenAlexW2747649474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.