Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28831002›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Foldamer hypothesis for the growth and sequence differentiation of prebiotic polymers.

Elizaveta Guseva, Ronald N Zuckermann, Ken A Dill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Evolution from Composome to RNA Replicase.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Emergent Chemical Reactivity and Complexity of RNA Condensates.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Article
  6. Science of the gaps.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. In silico evolution of globular protein folds from random sequences.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Origins of Life: The Protein Folding Problem all over again?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. The prebiotic emergence of biological evolution.Royal Society open science · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elizaveta GusevaLaufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794.
Ronald N ZuckermannMolecular Foundry, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720.
Ken A DillLaufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794; dill@laufercenter.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is not known how life originated. It is thought that prebiotic processes were able to synthesize short random polymers. However, then, how do short-chain molecules spontaneously grow longer? Also, how would random chains grow more informational and become autocatalytic (i.e., increasing their own concentrations)? We study the folding and binding of random sequences of hydrophobic ([Formula: see text]) and polar ([Formula: see text]) monomers in a computational model. We find that even short hydrophobic polar (

Indexed as

CatalysisHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsOrigin of LifePolymerizationPolymersPrebioticsProtein FoldingProteinsPolymersPrebioticsProteinsautocatalytic setsbiopolymersHP modelorigin of life

Identifiers

PMID28831002
PMCPMC5594640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.