Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28830765›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2017

A theoretical signal processing framework for linear diffusion MRI: Implications for parameter estimation and experiment design.

Divya Varadarajan, Justin P Haldar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. BrainSuite BIDS App: Containerized Workflows for MRI Analysis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Divya VaradarajanSignal and Image Processing Institute, Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Electronic address: dvaradar@usc.edu.
Justin P HaldarSignal and Image Processing Institute, Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Electronic address: jhaldar@usc.edu.

Funding

Mapping the Human Connectome: Structure, Function, and HeritabilityU54MH091657 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL, VAN ESSEN, DAVID C · 2010 to 2014
$34.7M
Interactive software for semiautomated analysis of structural brain imagesR01NS074980 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI LEAHY, RICHARD M, SHATTUCK, DAVID W · 2011 to 2021
$5.0M
A Brain Atlas for Mapping Connectivity in Focal EpilepsyR01NS089212 · NINDS · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI LEAHY, RICHARD M, MOSHER, JOHN COMPTON · 2015 to 2019
$2.7M
Faster MRI with Sparse Sampling and Low-Rank ModelingR21EB022951 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI HALDAR, JUSTIN PRITAM · 2016 to 2017
$430k
NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB022951NIMH NIH HHS U54 MH091657NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS074980NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS089212
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The data measured in diffusion MRI can be modeled as the Fourier transform of the Ensemble Average Propagator (EAP), a probability distribution that summarizes the molecular diffusion behavior of the spins within each voxel. This Fourier relationship is potentially advantageous because of the extensive theory that has been developed to characterize the sampling requirements, accuracy, and stability of linear Fourier reconstruction methods. However, existing diffusion MRI data sampling and signal estimation methods have largely been developed and tuned without the benefit of such theory, instead relying on approximations, intuition, and extensive empirical evaluation. This paper aims to address this discrepancy by introducing a novel theoretical signal processing framework for diffusion MRI. The new framework can be used to characterize arbitrary linear diffusion estimation methods with arbitrary q-space sampling, and can be used to theoretically evaluate and compare the accuracy, resolution, and noise-resilience of different data acquisition and parameter estimation techniques. The framework is based on the EAP, and makes very limited modeling assumptions. As a result, the approach can even provide new insight into the behavior of model-based linear diffusion estimation methods in contexts where the modeling assumptions are inaccurate. The practical usefulness of the proposed framework is illustrated using both simulated and real diffusion MRI data in applications such as choosing between different parameter estimation methods and choosing between different q-space sampling schemes.

Indexed as

Fourier AnalysisModels, TheoreticalSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedDiffusion MRIEnsemble average propagatorOrientation distribution functionSampling theory

Identifiers

PMID28830765
PMCPMC5696014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.