ArticleThe Journal of urology2018
Bladder Reconstruction Rates Differ among Centers Participating in National Spina Bifida Patient Registry.
Article in The Journal of urology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transitional urology: a comprehensive review of the transitional care process.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Review
- Improvement of bladder function after bladder augmentation surgery: a report of 26 years of clinical experience.Pediatric surgery international · 2022Article
- Trends in Procedures to Initiate Renal Replacement Therapy among People Living with Spina Bifida.The Journal of urology · 2021Article
- The Importance of Early Diagnosis and Management of Pediatric Neurogenic Bladder Dysfunction.Research and reports in urology · 2021Review
- Kidney Function Surveillance in the National Spina Bifida Patient Registry: A Retrospective Cohort Study.The Journal of urology · 2020Article
- Urodynamic and imaging findings in infants with myelomeningocele may predict need for future augmentation cystoplasty.Journal of pediatric urology · 2019Article
- Variation in surgical management of neurogenic bowel among centers participating in National Spina Bifida Patient Registry.Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWe performed an exploratory analysis of data from the NSBPR (National Spina Bifida Patient Registry) to assess variation in the frequency of bladder reconstruction surgeries among NSBPR centers. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe queried the 2009-2014 NSBPR to identify patients who had ever undergone bladder reconstruction surgeries. We evaluated demographic characteristics, spina bifida type, functional level, mobility and NSBPR center to determine whether any of these factors were associated with reconstructive surgery rates. Multivariable logistic regression was used to simultaneously adjust for the impact of these factors.
resultsWe identified 5,528 patients with spina bifida enrolled in the NSBPR. Of these patients 1,129 (20.4%) underwent bladder reconstruction (703 augmentation, 382 continent catheterizable channel, 189 bladder outlet procedure). Surgical patients were more likely older, female, nonHispanic white, with a higher lesion level, myelomeningocele diagnosis, nonambulators (all p <0.001) and nonprivately insured (p=0.018). Bladder reconstruction surgery rates varied among NSBPR centers (range 12.1% to 37.9%, p <0.001). After correcting for known confounders NSBPR center, spina bifida type, mobility, gender and age (all p <0.001) were significant predictors of surgical intervention. Race (p=0.19) and insurance status (p=0.11) were not associated with surgical intervention.
conclusionsThere is significant variation in rates of bladder reconstruction surgery among NSBPR centers. In addition to clinical factors such as mobility status, lesion type and lesion level, nonclinical factors such as patient age, gender and treating center are also associated with the likelihood of an individual undergoing bladder reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.