ArticleComparative medicine2017
Immune Activation of Platelets in Response to Serial Phlebotomy in Pigtailed Macaques (
Article in Comparative medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Serial phlebotomy is a common sampling practice for repeated-measures studies in biomedical research. In NHP, the effect of serial blood collection on RBC parameters has been characterized, but the effects on platelet parameters and other aspects of the hemogram have not been well studied. We sought to characterize the circulating platelet phenotype throughout the course of 7 serial phlebotomies spanning 30 d in pigtailed macaques (Macaca nemestrina). Phlebotomy was performed on 23 animals at days 0, 2, 4, 7, 10, 21, and 30 to quantify the circulating platelet count and markers of both hemostatic and immune platelet activation. Platelet immune activation was characterized by increases in surface MHC class I and II expression and increases in circulating platelet-leukocyte aggregates. These changes occurred in the absence of increases in the prohemostatic markers P-selectin and CD40L and without evidence of adverse clinical effects. Mild increases in platelet count, mean platelet volume, and immune activation occurred early in the study. After day 21, mean platelet volume and other hematologic parameters returned to baseline while changes in platelet count and immune activation were greater than during the first 10 d of the study. These data demonstrate that serial phlebotomy in NHP has delayed effects on platelet parameters, which may be a source of clinically silent, immunologic and physiologic variability within repeated measures studies. The impact of these effects on research aims should be considered when designing protocols requiring serial phlebotomy in NHP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28830584PMC5557209W2767420720What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.