ArticleBMC health services research2017
Relationship preferences and experience of primary care patients in continuity of care: a case study in Beijing, China.
Article in BMC health services research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Questionnaires that measure the quality of relationships between patients and primary care providers: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2018Pooled it
- Effects of a continuous nursing care model on elderly patients with total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2022Trial
- A core competency framework for healthcare workers to deliver basic public health service in primary healthcare settings in China.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Task Shifting, eHealth and Shared Decision-Making-Preference Heterogeneity in the Adult Population for Developments in Outpatient Primary Healthcare.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Service guidelines, models, and protocols for integrating rehabilitation services in primary healthcare in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa: a scoping review.Disability and rehabilitation · 2024Article
- User Satisfaction with Primary Health Care Rehabilitation Services in a South African Metropolitan District.Journal of patient experience · 2024Article
- The effects of information platform-based nursing on preventing venous thromboembolism in patients with hip fractures.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2022Article
- How to Make Primary Healthcare More Popular: Evidence from the Middle-Aged and Elderly in China.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Policy Goals of Contract Arrangements in Primary Care in Jeopardy: A Cross-Sectional Consumer Satisfaction Survey of Community Residents in Hangzhou, China.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Weighing patient attributes in antibiotic prescribing for upper respiratory tract infections: A discrete choice experiment on primary care physicians in Hubei Province, China.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Rural and urban differences in patient experience in China: a coarsened exact matching study from the perspective of residents.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Continuity of Care in Chronic Diseases: A Concept Analysis by Literature Review.Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing · 2020Review
- Quality of primary health care in China: challenges and recommendations.Lancet (London, England) · 2020Review
- "Patient centered care in medical disinformation era" among patients attending tertiary care hospital: A cross sectional study.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2020Article
- Patient experience of hospital care in China: major findings from the Chinese Patient Experience Questionnaire Survey (2016-2018).BMJ open · 2019Article
- The health service capacity of primary health care in West China: different perspectives of physicians and their patients.BMC health services research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundContinuity of care can bring a wide range of benefits to consumers, providers and health care systems. This study aimed to understand the relationship preferences of primary care patients and their associations with patient experience of continuity of care.
methodsA questionnaire survey was conducted on 700 patients who sought medical care from a community health organisation in Beijing. The survey contained four items examining the relationship preferences of the respondents, and a modified Questionnaire of Continuity between Care Levels (CCAENA) measuring patient experience of continuity of care based on a three dimensional (relational, informational and managerial) model. The associations between the relationship preferences and the experience of respondents in continuity of care was tested using a linear regression model controlling for age, sex, education, medical insurance, personal income and servicing facilities.
resultsThe respondents experienced relatively lower levels of informational and managerial continuity compared with relational continuity of care. More than 80% of respondents preferred free choice and a continuing relationship with doctors, compared with 59% who endorsed community facility control over hospital appointments. A preference for a continuing relationship with doctors was associated with all aspects of continuity of care. A preference in favour of community facility control over hospital appointments was a strong predictor of managerial continuity (β = 0.333, p < 0.001) and informational continuity (β = 0.256, p < 0.001). Patient preference for free choice of doctors was positively associated with relational continuity with specialists (p < 0.001), but not with primary care providers (p > 0.08). Perceived importance of information exchange was associated with relational and managerial continuity (p < 0.05), but not with informational continuity (p = 0.34).
conclusionsPatients prefer a high level of freedom of choice and sustained individual relationship with doctors. Relationship preferences of patients are associated with their experience of continuity of care. But patient strong preference for free choice of doctors is not aligned with relational continuity with primary care, a desirable feature of cost-effective healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.