Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28830503›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2017

An economic evaluation of the healthcare cost of tinnitus management in the UK.

David Stockdale, Don McFerran, Peter Brazier, Clive Pritchard, Tony Kay, Christopher Dowrick, Derek J Hoare

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05417711 (Efficacy of Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired With Tailor-Made Notched Music Therapy Versus Tailor-made Notched Music Training for Chronic Subjective Tinnitus), which is not on this map. Cited by 63 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05417711 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired With Tailor-Made Notched Music Therapy Versus Tailor-made Notched Music Training for Chronic Subjective Tinnitus: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityRan2023 to 2026Enrolled388ConditionsTinnitus, Subjective, Vagus Nerve Stimulation, Music Therapy, Double-Blind MethodArmsTranscutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired with Tailor-Made Notched Music Therapy, Tailor-made Notched Music Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Use of Expert Elicitation among Computational Modeling Studies in Health Research: A Systematic Review.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Systematic Review on Healthcare and Societal Costs of Tinnitus.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Efficacy of Nortriptyline-Topiramate and Verapamil-Paroxetine in Tinnitus Management: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Ginkgo biloba extract EGb 761International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2018
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Tinnitus.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  9. Noise and the risk of tinnitus: A two-sample Mendelian randomized study.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Greenness, Genetic Predisposition, and Tinnitus.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Targeting the Limbic System: Insights into Its Involvement in Tinnitus.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

David StockdaleBritish Tinnitus Association, Ground Floor, Unit 5, Acorn Business Park, Woodseats Close, Sheffield, S8 0TB, UK.
Don McFerranColchester Hospital University NHS Foundation Trust, Lexden Rd, Colchester Essex, CO3 3NB, UK.
Peter BrazierOptimity Advisors, 1st Floor Kemp House, 152-160 City Rd, London, EC1V 2DW, UK.
Clive PritchardWickenstones Ltd, Unit 26, 127 Olympic Avenue, Milton Park, OX14 4SA, UK.
Tony KayAintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Lower Lane, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK.
Christopher DowrickDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK.
Derek J HoareNIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Otology and Hearing Group, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG1 5DU, UK. derek.hoare@nottingham.ac.uk.
Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBBritish Tinnitus Association · GBCalderstones Hospital · GBCity, University of London · GBEssex County Hospital · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is no standard treatment pathway for tinnitus patients in the UK. Possible therapies include education and reassurance, cognitive behavioural therapies, modified tinnitus retraining therapy (education and sound enrichment), or amplification of external sound using hearing aids. However, the effectiveness of most therapies is somewhat controversial. As health services come under economic pressure to deploy resources more effectively there is an increasing need to demonstrate the value of tinnitus therapies, and how value may be continuously enhanced. The objective of this project was to map out existing clinical practice, estimate the NHS costs associated with the management approaches used, and obtain initial indicative estimates of cost-effectiveness.

methodsCurrent treatment pathways, costs and health outcomes were determined from the tinnitus literature, national statistics, a patient survey, and expert opinion. These were used to create an Excel-based economic model of therapy options for tinnitus patients. The probabilities associated with the likelihood of an individual patient receiving a particular combination of therapies was used to calculate the average cost of treatment per patient, average health outcome per patient measured in QALYs gained, and cost-effectiveness, measured by the average cost per QALY gained.

resultsThe average cost of tinnitus treatment per patient per year is GB£717, equating to an NHS healthcare bill of GB£750 million per year. Across all pathways, tinnitus therapy costs £10,600 per QALY gained. Results were relatively insensitive to restrictions on access to cognitive behaviour therapy, and a subsequent reliance on other therapies.

conclusionsNHS provisions for tinnitus are cost-effective against the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence cost-effective threshold. Most interventions help, but education alone offers very small QALY gains. The most cost-effective therapies in the model were delivered within audiology.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsCost-Benefit AnalysisHealth ServicesHearing AidsHumansModels, EconomicQuality-Adjusted Life YearsState MedicineSurveys and QuestionnairesTinnitusUnited KingdomAudiologyClinical psychologyCognitive behaviour therapyCost effectivenessEar nose and throatGeneral practiceHearing aidsTinnitus

Identifiers

PMID28830503
PMCPMC5567641
OpenAlexW2747626400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.