Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28830439›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2017

Household beliefs about malaria testing and treatment in Western Kenya: the role of health worker adherence to malaria test results.

Indrani Saran, Elisa M Maffioli, Diana Menya, Wendy Prudhomme O'Meara

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Indrani SaranDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, 310 Trent Drive, Durham, NC, 27701, USA. indrani.saran@duke.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7416-652X
Elisa M MaffioliDepartment of Economics, Duke University, Durham, USA.
Diana MenyaSchool of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Moi University, Eldoret, Kenya.
Wendy Prudhomme O'MearaDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, 310 Trent Drive, Durham, NC, 27701, USA.
Duke University · USMoi University · KE

Funding

Innovative partnership to target antimalarial subsidies in the retail sectorR01AI110478 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI PRUDHOMMEOMEARA, WENDY · 2014 to 2017
$2.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI110478
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough use of malaria diagnostic tests has increased in recent years, health workers often prescribe anti-malarial drugs to individuals who test negative for malaria. This study investigates how health worker adherence to malaria case management guidelines influences individuals' beliefs about whether their illness was malaria, and their confidence in the effectiveness of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT).

methodsA survey was conducted with 2065 households in Western Kenya about a household member's treatment actions for a recent febrile illness. The survey also elicited the individual's (or their caregiver's) beliefs about the illness and about malaria testing and treatment. Logistic regressions were used to test the association between these beliefs and whether the health worker adhered to malaria testing and treatment guidelines.

resultsOf the 1070 individuals who visited a formal health facility during their illness, 82% were tested for malaria. ACT rates for malaria-positive and negative individuals were 89 and 49%, respectively. Overall, 65% of individuals/caregivers believed that the illness was "very likely" malaria. Individuals/caregivers had higher odds of saying that the illness was "very likely" malaria when the individual was treated with ACT, and this was the case both among individuals not tested for malaria [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 3.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.65 7.10], P = 0.001] and among individuals tested for malaria, regardless of their test result. In addition, 72% of ACT-takers said the drug was "very likely" effective in treating malaria. However, malaria-negative individuals who were treated with ACT had lower odds of saying that the drugs were "very likely" effective than ACT-takers who were not tested or who tested positive for malaria (AOR 0.29, 95% CI [0.13 0.63], P = 0.002).

conclusionIndividuals/caregivers were more likely to believe that the illness was malaria when the patient was treated with ACT, regardless of their test result. Moreover, malaria-negative individuals treated with ACT had lower confidence in the drug than other individuals who took ACT. These results suggest that ensuring health worker adherence to malaria case management guidelines will not only improve ACT targeting, but may also increase patient/caregivers' confidence in malaria testing and treatment.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAdultCase ManagementDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFamily CharacteristicsFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansKenyaMalariaMaleMiddle AgedArtemisinin-combination therapyCase managementHousehold beliefsMalariaRapid diagnostic testsTargetingTreatment-seeking behavior

Identifiers

PMID28830439
PMCPMC5568326
OpenAlexW2750428967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.