Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28830394›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2017

Young women's perceptions of transactional sex and sexual agency: a qualitative study in the context of rural South Africa.

Meghna Ranganathan, Catherine MacPhail, Audrey Pettifor, Kathleen Kahn, Nomhle Khoza, Rhian Twine, Charlotte Watts, Lori Heise

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Meghna RanganathanDepartment of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), London, UK. Meghna.Ranganathan@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5827-343X
Catherine MacPhailWits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Audrey PettiforWits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Kathleen KahnMRC/Wits Rural Public Health and Health Transitions Unit (Agincourt), School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Nomhle KhozaWits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Rhian TwineMRC/Wits Rural Public Health and Health Transitions Unit (Agincourt), School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Charlotte WattsDepartment of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), London, UK.
Lori HeiseDepartment of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), London, UK.

Funding

LOC: HIV Prevention Trials NetworkUM1AI068619 · NIAID · FAMILY HEALTH INTERNATIONAL · PI MYRON Scott COHEN, Sinead Delany-Moretlwe · 2011 to 2026
$779.5M
SDMC: HPTN 084 Pregnancy SupplementUM1AI068617 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Elizabeth Renata Brown, Deborah J Donnell · 2011 to 2026
$204.9M
LC: HIV Prevention Trials Network - Laboratory Support for the SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence Study (CoVPN 5002)UM1AI068613 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SUSAN H ESHLEMAN, Mark A Marzinke · 2011 to 2026
$100.2M
University of North Carolina Global HIV Prevention and Treatment Clinical Trials Unit 2024 SupplementUM1AI069423 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Joseph J Eron, MINA CHRISTINE HOSSEINIPOUR · 2012 to 2026
$71.8M
Carolina Population CenterR24HD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MORGAN, SAMUEL PHILIP · 2005 to 2014
$10.0M
Research Services CoreP2CHD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAREN B GUZZO · 2015 to 2026
$9.6M
Effects of Cash Transfer and Community Mobilization in Young South African WomenR01MH087118 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI PETTIFOR, AUDREY · 2009 to 2013
$2.5M
NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068613NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068617NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068619NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI069423NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050924NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD050924NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH087118
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence shows that HIV prevalence among young women in sub-Saharan Africa increases almost five-fold between ages 15 and 24, with almost a quarter of young women infected by their early-to mid-20s. Transactional sex or material exchange for sex is a relationship dynamic that has been shown to have an association with HIV infection.

methodsUsing five focus group discussions and 19 in-depth interviews with young women enrolled in the HPTN 068 conditional cash transfer trial (2011-2015), this qualitative study explores young women's perceptions of transactional sex within the structural and cultural context of rural South Africa. The analysis also considers the degree to which young women perceive themselves as active agents in such relationships and whether they recognise a link between transactional sex and HIV risk.

resultsYoung women believe that securing their own financial resources will ultimately improve their bargaining position in their sexual relationships, and open doors to a more financially independent future. Findings suggest there is a nuanced relationship between sex, love and gifts: money has symbolic meaning, and money transfers, when framed as gifts, indicates a young woman's value and commitment from the man. This illustrates the complexity of transactional sex; the way it is positioned in the HIV literature ignores that "exchanges" serve as fulcrums around which romantic relationships are organised. Finally, young women express agency in their choice of partner, but their agency weakens once they are in a relationship characterised by exchange, which may undermine their ability to translate perceived agency into STI and HIV risk reduction efforts.

conclusionsThis research underscores the need to recognise that transactional sex is embedded in adolescent romantic relationships, but that certain aspects make young women particularly vulnerable to HIV. This is especially true in situations of restricted choice and circumscribed employment opportunities. HIV prevention educational programmes could be coupled with income generation trainings, in order to leverage youth resilience and protective skills within the confines of difficult economic and social circumstances. This would provide young women with the knowledge and means to more successfully navigate safer sexual relationships.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsRural PopulationAdolescentFemaleFocus GroupsHIV InfectionsHumansMotivationQualitative ResearchRisk-TakingSex WorkSouth AfricaYoung AdultAdolescent young womenAspirationsHIVRisky sexual behavioursSexual agencySexual exchangeSexual relationshipsSub-Saharan AfricaTransactional sex

Identifiers

PMID28830394
PMCPMC5568133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.