Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28830385›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2017

Strengthening general practice/family medicine in Europe-advice from professionals from 30 European countries.

Natalia Zarbailov, Stefan Wilm, Howard Tandeter, Francesco Carelli, Mette Brekke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. General practice-related MeSH terms in main journals: a bibliometric analysis from 2011 to 2021.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  4. What competencies do European general practice trainees value the most? A prioritisation exercise using a Delphi-informed approach.Education for primary care : an official publication of the Association of Course Organisers, National Association of GP Tutors, World Organisation of Family Doctors · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Strengthening general practice by extending specialty training?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Natalia ZarbailovFamily Medicine Department, State University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Nicolae Testemitanu", Bd. Stefan cel Mare 165, MD-2004, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova.
Stefan WilmInstitute of General Practice, Heinrich-Heine-University, Werdener Str. 4, D-40227, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Howard TandeterDepartment of Family Medicine and Siaal research center for family medicine and primary care, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Francesco CarelliUniversity of Milan, Francesco Sforza 35, Milan, Italy.
Mette BrekkeDepartment of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1132 018, Blindern, Norway. mette.brekke@medisin.uio.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3454-2329

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSubstantial variations are still to be found in the strength of general practice/family medicine (GP/FM) across Europe regarding governance, workforce competence and performance, as well as academic development and position. Governments are encouraged by the WHO to secure high quality primary health care to their population, a necessity for reaching the goal "Health for all". The present study aimed at investigating the opinions of council members of the European Academy of Teachers in General Practice (EURACT) on necessary actions to strengthen the position of GP/FM in their country.

methodsThe study used a mixed methods exploratory sequential design. EURACT representatives from 32 European countries first participated in brain-storming on how to strengthen GP/FM in Europe. Later, representatives from 37 countries were asked to individually score the relevance of the proposed actions for their country on a 9-point Likert scale. They were also asked to evaluate the status of GP/FM in their country on four dimensions.

resultsRespondents from 30 European countries returned complete questionnaires. To build and secure GP/FM as an academic discipline comprising teaching and research was seen as essential, regardless the present status of GP/FM in the respective country. To build GP/FM as a specialty on the same level as other specialties was seen as important in countries where GP/FM held a strong or medium strong position. The importance of common learning objectives and a defined bibliography were stated by respondents from countries where GP/FM presently has a weak position.

conclusionsIn order to strengthen GP/FM throughout Europe, EURACT and other professional organizations must establish common goals and share expertise between countries. To influence decision makers through information on cost-effectiveness of a GP/FM-based health care system is also important.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelClinical CompetencePrimary Health CareEducation, Medical, GraduateEuropeFaculty, MedicalFamily PracticeGeneral PracticeHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesEURACTEuropeFamily medicineGeneral practiceMixed methodsQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID28830385
PMCPMC5568085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.