Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28830238›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2017

The role of

Priya Narayanan, Anju Sahdev

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Comparative Performance ofWorld journal of nuclear medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  8. The value of combined MRI, enhanced CT andClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Article
  9. Molecular image-guided surgery in gynaecological cancer: where do we stand?European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. A proper protocol for routineEJNMMI physics · 2023
    Article
  12. Asphericity derived from [Scientific reports · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. The Effect of Carbogen Breathing onBioMed research international · 2019
    Article
  18. Prognostic value of posttreatmentEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Priya Narayanan1 Department of Imaging, University College Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK.
Anju Sahdev2 Department of Imaging, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsAdultAgedEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyUterine Cervical NeoplasmsFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID28830238
PMCPMC5963379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.