ReviewThe British journal of radiology2017
The role of
Review in The British journal of radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Performance of pre-treatment ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for detecting metastasis in ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2018Pooled it
- Review
- Insights into endometrial cancer management: a comprehensive guide through multimodality imaging.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Comparative Performance ofWorld journal of nuclear medicine · 2026Article
- Emerging Radiopharmaceuticals Beyond FDG for Ovarian Cancer: A Review of Advances in Nuclear Medicine.Cancer medicine · 2025Review
- Evaluation of metabolic uptake in gynecological organs using FDG-PET in women diagnosed with nongynecological malignancies.Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- The value of combined MRI, enhanced CT andClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024Article
- Molecular image-guided surgery in gynaecological cancer: where do we stand?European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Review
- Management of retroperitoneal high-grade serous carcinoma of unknown origin: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2024Article
- A proper protocol for routineEJNMMI physics · 2023Article
- Asphericity derived from [Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Review
- Survival effect of pre-RT PET-CT on cervical cancer: Image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy era.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Review
- Prognostic Value of Pretherapeutic Primary Tumor MTV from [Metabolites · 2021Article
- The Effect of Carbogen Breathing onBioMed research international · 2019Article
- Prognostic value of posttreatmentEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.