Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28830223›Full record

ArticleJournal of endourology2017

Defining the Costs of Reusable Flexible Ureteroscope Reprocessing Using Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing.

Dylan Isaacson, Tessnim Ahmad, Ian Metzler, David T Tzou, Kazumi Taguchi, Manint Usawachintachit, Samuel Zetumer, Benjamin Sherer, Marshall Stoller, Thomas Chi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of endourology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. The cost of operating room delays in an endourology center.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2020
    Article
  7. Current State of Surgical Lighting.Surgery journal (New York, N.Y.) · 2020
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Single-use flexible ureteroscopes: update and perspective in developing countries. A narrative review.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Review
  11. Review
  12. The cost-effectiveness of reusable flexible ureteroscopes: An institutional audit.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Dylan Isaacson1 School of Medicine, University of California , San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Tessnim Ahmad1 School of Medicine, University of California , San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Ian Metzler2 Department of Urology, University of California , San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
David T Tzou2 Department of Urology, University of California , San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Kazumi Taguchi2 Department of Urology, University of California , San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Manint Usawachintachit4 Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Chulalongkorn University , Bangkok, Thailand .
Samuel Zetumer1 School of Medicine, University of California , San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Benjamin Sherer2 Department of Urology, University of California , San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Marshall Stoller2 Department of Urology, University of California , San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Thomas Chi2 Department of Urology, University of California , San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCareful decontamination and sterilization of reusable flexible ureteroscopes used in ureterorenoscopy cases prevent the spread of infectious pathogens to patients and technicians. However, inefficient reprocessing and unavailability of ureteroscopes sent out for repair can contribute to expensive operating room (OR) delays. Time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) was applied to describe the time and costs involved in reprocessing. MATERIALS AND

methodsDirect observation and timing were performed for all steps in reprocessing of reusable flexible ureteroscopes following operative procedures. Estimated times needed for each step by which damaged ureteroscopes identified during reprocessing are sent for repair were characterized through interviews with purchasing analyst staff. Process maps were created for reprocessing and repair detailing individual step times and their variances. Cost data for labor and disposables used were applied to calculate per minute and average step costs.

resultsTen ureteroscopes were followed through reprocessing. Process mapping for ureteroscope reprocessing averaged 229.0 ± 74.4 minutes, whereas sending a ureteroscope for repair required an estimated 143 minutes per repair. Most steps demonstrated low variance between timed observations. Ureteroscope drying was the longest and highest variance step at 126.5 ± 55.7 minutes and was highly dependent on manual air flushing through the ureteroscope working channel and ureteroscope positioning in the drying cabinet. Total costs for reprocessing totaled $96.13 per episode, including the cost of labor and disposable items.

conclusionsUtilizing TDABC delineates the full spectrum of costs associated with ureteroscope reprocessing and identifies areas for process improvement to drive value-based care. At our institution, ureteroscope drying was one clearly identified target area. Implementing training in ureteroscope drying technique could save up to 2 hours per reprocessing event, potentially preventing expensive OR delays.

Indexed as

Costs and Cost AnalysisEquipment FailureEquipment ReuseHumansInfection ControlOperating RoomsSterilizationTime and Motion StudiesUreteroscopesUreteroscopycost analysissterile processingtime-driven activity-based costingureteroscope

Identifiers

PMID28830223
PMCPMC5652038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.