Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28830201›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2017

Enhanced radiation dose and DNA damage associated with iodinated contrast media in diagnostic X-ray imaging.

Richard Harbron, Elizabeth A Ainsbury, Simon D Bouffler, Rick J Tanner, Jonathan S Eakins, Mark S Pearce

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Richard Harbron1 Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Elizabeth A Ainsbury3 Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Public Health England, Chilton, UK.
Simon D Bouffler3 Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Public Health England, Chilton, UK.
Rick J Tanner3 Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Public Health England, Chilton, UK.
Jonathan S Eakins3 Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Public Health England, Chilton, UK.
Mark S Pearce1 Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Public Health England · GBNewcastle University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A review was undertaken of studies reporting increased DNA damage in circulating blood cells and increased organ doses, for X-ray exposures enhanced by iodinated contrast media (ICM), compared to unenhanced imaging. This effect may be due to ICM molecules acting as a source of secondary radiation (Auger/photoelectrons, fluorescence X-rays) following absorption of primary X-ray photons. It is unclear if the reported increase in DNA damage to blood cells necessarily implies an increased risk of developing cancer. Upon ICM-enhancement, the attenuation properties of blood differ substantially from surrounding tissues. Increased energy deposition is likely to occur within very close proximity to ICM molecules (within a few tens of micrometres). Consequently, in many situations, damage and dose enhancement may be restricted to the blood and vessel wall only. Increased cancer risks may be possible, in cases where ICM molecules are given sufficient time to reach the capillary network and interstitial fluid at the time of exposure. In all situations, the extrapolation of blood cell damage to other tissues requires caution where contrast media are involved. Future research is needed to determine the impact of ICM on dose to cells outside the blood itself and vessel walls, and to determine the concentration of ICM in blood vessels and interstitial fluid at the time of exposure.

Indexed as

DNA DamageNeoplasms, Radiation-InducedRadiation DosageBlood CellsBlood VesselsCapillariesContrast MediaDiagnostic ImagingExtracellular FluidHumansIodineContrast MediaIodine

Identifiers

PMID28830201
PMCPMC5963364
OpenAlexW2750429974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.