ArticleThe British journal of radiology2017
Assessment of structural similarity in CT using filtered backprojection and iterative reconstruction: a phantom study with 3D printed lung vessels.
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Systematic Review on 3D-Printed Imaging and Dosimetry Phantoms in Radiation Therapy.Technology in cancer research & treatment · 2019Pooled it
- Reconstruction algorithms and arm positioning effects on abdominal CT image quality and radiation dose: a phantom study.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- Assessment of image quality and establishment of local acceptable quality dose for computed tomography based on patient effective diameter.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2024Article
- Applicability Evaluation of Full-Reference Image Quality Assessment Methods for Computed Tomography Images.Journal of digital imaging · 2023Article
- Survey of methods and principles in three-dimensional reconstruction from two-dimensional medical images.Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art · 2023Review
- Three-dimensional printing of patient-specific computed tomography lung phantoms: a reader study.PNAS nexus · 2023Article
- A customized anthropomorphic 3D-printed phantom to reproducibility assessment in computed tomography: an oncological case study.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for abdominal multidetector CT at different tube voltages: assessment of image quality and radiation dose in a phantom study.European radiology · 2022Article
- Computational Modeling and Experimental Characterization of Extrusion Printing into Suspension Baths.Advanced healthcare materials · 2022Article
- Three-dimensional printing of patient-specific lung phantoms for CT imaging: Emulating lung tissue with accurate attenuation profiles and textures.Medical physics · 2022Article
- LoDoPaB-CT, a benchmark dataset for low-dose computed tomography reconstruction.Scientific data · 2021Article
- Development of a CT imaging phantom of anthromorphic lung using fused deposition modeling 3D printing.Medicine · 2020Article
- Automatic quantitative analysis of pulmonary vascular morphology in CT images.Medical physics · 2019Article
- Role of 3D reconstruction in the evaluation of patients with lower segment oesophageal cancer.Journal of thoracic disease · 2018Article
- Recent advances on the development of phantoms using 3D printing for imaging with CT, MRI, PET, SPECT, and ultrasound.Medical physics · 2018Review
- Dose Reduction and Low-Contrast Detectability Using Iterative CBCT Reconstruction Algorithm for Radiotherapy.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
- PixelPrint: Three-dimensional printing of realistic patient-specific lung phantoms for CT imaging.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical EngineeringArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the performance of three generations of CT reconstruction techniques using structural similarity (SSIM) as a measure of image quality for CT scans of a chest phantom with 3D printed lung vessels.
methodsCT images of the chest phantom were acquired at seven dose levels by changing the tube current while other acquisition parameters were kept constant. Three CT reconstruction techniques were applied on each acquisition. The first technique was filtered backprojection (FBP), the second technique was FBP with iterative filtering (adaptive iteration dose reduction in 3 dimensions (AIDR 3D)) and the third technique was model-based iterative reconstruction (Forward projected model-based Iterative Reconstruction SoluTion (FIRST)). Image quality of the CT data was quantified in terms of SSIM. The SSIM index was used for image quality comparison between the dose levels and different reconstruction techniques. The SSIM index gives a value between 0 and 1, with 0 as the lowest image quality and 1 as an excellent image quality.
resultsThe lowest SSIM index was observed for FBP at all dose levels. The reconstruction technique with the highest SSIM depends on the dose level. For tube currents higher than 80 mA, AIDR 3D showed the highest SSIM index, and for tube currents lower or equal to 80 mA FIRST showed the highest SSIM index.
conclusionSSIM index is a robust quantity and is correlated to the image quality as perceived by the humans. Advanced CT reconstruction techniques provide better image quality in all conditions compared to FBP. Advances in knowledge: SSIM is a robust measure to compare CT image quality for advanced reconstruction techniques relative to a reference. The 3D print technology is an useful method for the development of dedicated phantoms for CT image quality evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.