Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28830007›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in genetics & development2017

Beyond speciation genes: an overview of genome stability in evolution and speciation.

Anne-Marie Dion-Côté, Daniel A Barbash

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in genetics & development, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Speciation through chromosomal fusion and fission in Lepidoptera.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Activation of P53 pathway contributes toProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anne-Marie Dion-CôtéDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, 526 Campus Road, Ithaca, NY 14853, United States.
Daniel A BarbashDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, 526 Campus Road, Ithaca, NY 14853, United States. Electronic address: barbash@cornell.edu.
Cornell University · US

Funding

Molecular Genetics of Drosophila Hybrid LethalityR01GM074737 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI BARBASH, DANIEL A · 2005 to 2022
$4.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM074737
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome stability ensures individual fitness and reliable transmission of genetic information. Hybridization between diverging lineages can trigger genome instability, highlighting its potential role in post-zygotic reproductive isolation. We argue that genome instability is not merely one of several types of hybrid incompatibility, but rather that genome stability is one of the very first and most fundamental traits that can break down when two diverged genomes are combined. Future work will reveal how frequent and predictable genome instability is in hybrids, how it affects hybrid fitness, and whether it is a direct cause or consequence of speciation.

Indexed as

Genetic SpeciationHybridization, GeneticAnimalsGenomic InstabilityReproductionReproductive Isolation

Identifiers

PMID28830007
PMCPMC5716907
OpenAlexW2746271563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.