Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28829820›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Residency and movement patterns of an apex predatory shark (Galeocerdo cuvier) at the Galapagos Marine Reserve.

David Acuña-Marrero, Adam N H Smith, Neil Hammerschlag, Alex Hearn, Marti J Anderson, Hannah Calich, Matthew D M Pawley, Chris Fischer, Pelayo Salinas-de-León

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

David Acuña-MarreroCharles Darwin Research Station, Puerto Ayora, Islas Galápagos, Ecuador.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1308-1500
Adam N H SmithInstitute of Natural and Mathematical Sciences (INMS), Massey University, Albany Campus, Auckland, New Zealand.
Neil HammerschlagRosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, Miami, United States of America.
Alex HearnUniversidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, Ecuador.
Marti J AndersonNew Zealand Institute for Advanced Study (NZIAS), Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand.
Hannah CalichRosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, Miami, United States of America.
Matthew D M PawleyInstitute of Natural and Mathematical Sciences (INMS), Massey University, Albany Campus, Auckland, New Zealand.
Chris FischerOCEARCH, Park City, United States of America.
Pelayo Salinas-de-LeónCharles Darwin Research Station, Puerto Ayora, Islas Galápagos, Ecuador.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The potential effectiveness of marine protected areas (MPAs) as a conservation tool for large sharks has been questioned due to the limited spatial extent of most MPAs in contrast to the complex life history and high mobility of many sharks. Here we evaluated the movement dynamics of a highly migratory apex predatory shark (tiger shark Galeocerdo cuvier) at the Galapagos Marine Reserve (GMR). Using data from satellite tracking passive acoustic telemetry, and stereo baited remote underwater video, we estimated residency, activity spaces, site fidelity, distributional abundances and migration patterns from the GMR and in relation to nesting beaches of green sea turtles (Chelonia mydas), a seasonally abundant and predictable prey source for large tiger sharks. Tiger sharks exhibited a high degree of philopatry, with 93% of the total satellite-tracked time across all individuals occurring within the GMR. Large sharks (> 200 cm TL) concentrated their movements in front of the two most important green sea turtle-nesting beaches in the GMR, visiting them on a daily basis during nocturnal hours. In contrast, small sharks (< 200 cm TL) rarely visited turtle-nesting areas and displayed diurnal presence at a third location where only immature sharks were found. Small and some large individuals remained in the three study areas even outside of the turtle-nesting season. Only two sharks were satellite-tracked outside of the GMR, and following long-distance migrations, both individuals returned to turtle-nesting beaches at the subsequent turtle-nesting season. The spatial patterns of residency and site fidelity of tiger sharks suggest that the presence of a predictable source of prey and suitable habitats might reduce the spatial extent of this large shark that is highly migratory in other parts of its range. This highly philopatric behaviour enhances the potential effectiveness of the GMR for their protection.

Indexed as

EcosystemPredatory BehaviorAnimal MigrationAnimalsAtlantic OceanFemaleMalePopulation DensitySharksTurtles

Identifiers

PMID28829820
PMCPMC5567640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.